2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781107337787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empire of Hell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 116 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…89 Yet as Carey argues, Maconochie's claim to being a neophyte to the topic of punishment was "somewhat specious", pointing to Maconochie's covering letter to Franklin which accompanied his full report. 90 There Maconochie apologised to Franklin for the damning nature of his findings, recalling that "when speculating on this at a distance, I was very differently impressed", and that "in all our conversations during the passage out regarding the controversy between Archbishop Whately and Colonel Arthur on the subject, I uniformly supported the latter's views"-that is, Maconochie had been more persuaded by the pro-transportation view articulated by Arthur. 91 Moreover, in his 1839 work Australiana, which appeared in the wake of his dismissal, Maconochie rejected the claims of his critics that he had expressed "a decided opinion … within four months after my arrival in the Colony … and that I must consequently have come out with a prepossession against the System".…”
Section: Revue D'études Benthamiennes 19 | 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 Yet as Carey argues, Maconochie's claim to being a neophyte to the topic of punishment was "somewhat specious", pointing to Maconochie's covering letter to Franklin which accompanied his full report. 90 There Maconochie apologised to Franklin for the damning nature of his findings, recalling that "when speculating on this at a distance, I was very differently impressed", and that "in all our conversations during the passage out regarding the controversy between Archbishop Whately and Colonel Arthur on the subject, I uniformly supported the latter's views"-that is, Maconochie had been more persuaded by the pro-transportation view articulated by Arthur. 91 Moreover, in his 1839 work Australiana, which appeared in the wake of his dismissal, Maconochie rejected the claims of his critics that he had expressed "a decided opinion … within four months after my arrival in the Colony … and that I must consequently have come out with a prepossession against the System".…”
Section: Revue D'études Benthamiennes 19 | 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%