2001
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.6.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical and hermeneutic approaches to phenomenological research in psychology: A comparison.

Abstract: Empirical phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology, the 2 most common approaches to phenomenological research in psychology, are described, and their similarities and differences examined. A specific method associated with each form of phenomenological inquiry was used to analyze an interview transcript of a woman's experience of work-family role conflict. A considerable degree of similarity was found in the resulting descriptions. It is argued that such convergence in analyses is due to the human capacitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insert Table 3 around here Colaizzi's (1978) method derives from empirical phenomenology, which has been argued to be the most common form of phenomenological research (Hein and Austin, 2001). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insert Table 3 around here Colaizzi's (1978) method derives from empirical phenomenology, which has been argued to be the most common form of phenomenological research (Hein and Austin, 2001). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both IPA and FST aim to explore areas of concern rather than test a hypothesis generated by the researcher, and they both aim to add to the body of knowledge by contributing specific, context dependent, analytic accounts of participants' lived experience. Hein and Austin (2001) described this as providing "us with a deeper and fuller understanding of human existence, ourselves and others" (p. 4). Harding used the term "filling in the gaps" (1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that participant bias was minimal as surveys were anonymous and the focus groups tended to develop a life of their own, based on their constituency. For example, it was not unusual for spontaneous discussions about supervision to develop between the focus group participants, as the following example demonstrates, Although some (Hein & Austin, 2001) would maintain that it is not possible for the researcher to absolutely put aside their biases and assumptions, Weber (2003 pp.vii) claims that researchers who are "pluralistic" in their selection and application of research methodologies, are less likely to fall captive to a particular world view or paradigm. Weber (2003) argues that this frees the researcher to consider the interplay between the methodological construction/s and the study topic in their analysis and interpretation.…”
Section: Reflexivitymentioning
confidence: 99%