2017
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003914.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical antibiotics targeting gram-positive bacteria for the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer

Abstract: Based on very low- or low-quality evidence using the GRADE approach and overall low risk of bias, the current evidence shows that the empirical routine addition of antiGP treatment, namely glycopeptides, does not improve the outcomes of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In alignment with epidemiologic changes showing an increase in infection by Gram-positive organisms, anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (usually vancomycin) have been incorporated in the empirical regimen (7)(8)(9). However, a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing regimens with or without vancomycin failed to show an advantage of vancomycin in the initial empirical regimen (10,11). Indeed, practical guidelines for the management of febrile neutropenia do not recommend its routine use in the empirical antibiotic regimen, except in certain circumstances, such as suspected catheter-related infection, skin and soft tissue infection, pneumonia, or hemodynamic instability (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In alignment with epidemiologic changes showing an increase in infection by Gram-positive organisms, anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (usually vancomycin) have been incorporated in the empirical regimen (7)(8)(9). However, a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing regimens with or without vancomycin failed to show an advantage of vancomycin in the initial empirical regimen (10,11). Indeed, practical guidelines for the management of febrile neutropenia do not recommend its routine use in the empirical antibiotic regimen, except in certain circumstances, such as suspected catheter-related infection, skin and soft tissue infection, pneumonia, or hemodynamic instability (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overuse of vancomycin is associated with future development of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus sp and Staphylococcus sp. Furthermore, receipt of vancomycin in patients with NF does not decrease the time to defervescence (Paesmans et al, 2011) or all-cause mortality (Beyar-Katz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of empirical vancomycin should be reserved for patients with severe CVC-associated infections (e.g., chills and rigors with infusion through catheter, etc. ), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), pneumonia, volatile hemodynamics, severe mucositis with a history of FQ prophylaxis and empirical ceftazidime, or documented recent or current Gram-positive infection, as routine use does not decrease mortality (Freifeld et al, 2011;Freifeld and Razonable, 2014;Beyar-Katz et al, 2017;Wright et al, 2013). Furthermore, widespread deployment of vancomycin empirically promotes resistance in Enterococcus sp and Staphylococcus sp, with increased potential for adverse events (Freifeld et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the guideline recommendation, addition of Gram-positive antibiotic coverage to the initial empiric antibiotic regimen has not been associated with significant clinical benefit. [ 1 14 15 16 ] A meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials found that addition of Gram-positive antibiotic coverage to standard empiric therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality in patients with cancer and neutropenic fever. [ 14 ] However, in our study, vancomycin was added to near 50% of initial empiric antibiotic regimen because most of our practitioners had fear of upcoming hemodynamic instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%