2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315185354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Comics Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this SPECT theory is silent with regard to codality switching and integration, it is reasonable to assume that the integration costs observed in the present set of experiments can be traced back to encodingthat is frontend processing. Studying these integration costs using eyetracking methods seems to be an auspicious approach as eye-tracking studies have shown that comic readers spend more time on panels also including texts as compared to panels with just pictorial content (Chiba, Tanaka, Shoji, & Toyama, 2007;Laubrock, Hohenstein, & Kümmerer, 2018). Such a study could also address the alternative explanation of the present findings according to which codality switching just surprises participants.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although this SPECT theory is silent with regard to codality switching and integration, it is reasonable to assume that the integration costs observed in the present set of experiments can be traced back to encodingthat is frontend processing. Studying these integration costs using eyetracking methods seems to be an auspicious approach as eye-tracking studies have shown that comic readers spend more time on panels also including texts as compared to panels with just pictorial content (Chiba, Tanaka, Shoji, & Toyama, 2007;Laubrock, Hohenstein, & Kümmerer, 2018). Such a study could also address the alternative explanation of the present findings according to which codality switching just surprises participants.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although this SPECT theory is silent with regard to codality switching and integration, it is reasonable to assume that the integration costs observed in the present set of experiments can be traced back to encoding, that is frontend processing. Studying these integration costs using eyetracking methods seems to be an auspicious approach as eye-tracking studies have shown that comic readers spend more time on panels also including texts as compared to panels with just pictorial content (Chiba, Tanaka, Shoji, & Toyama, 2007;Laubrock, Hohenstein, & Kümmerer, 2018). Such a study could also address the alternative explanation of the present findings according to which codality switching just surprises participants.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Laubrock and Dubray [23] have similarly shown that deep convolutional neural networks are well-suited to capture graphical aspects of comics books and can successfully be used in categorizing illustrator style, pacing the way for a visual stylometry. Laubrock et al [24] show that eye-tracking data obtained from comics readers as a measure of visual attention and CNN predictions of empirical saliency based on Deep Gaze II [22] tend to focus on similar regions of comics pages. Regions containing text such as speech balloons or captions are focused most often.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual elements just mentioned can also be distributed across several panels or bleed into the void between panels called the "gutter". Recent overviews of comics research can be found in Cohn [7], Augereau et al [3], and Dunst et al [12]. Here we focus on one particular element of graphic structure, namely, speech balloons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%