2024
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1320189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical comparison of deep learning models for fNIRS pain decoding

Raul Fernandez Rojas,
Calvin Joseph,
Ghazal Bargshady
et al.

Abstract: IntroductionPain assessment is extremely important in patients unable to communicate and it is often done by clinical judgement. However, assessing pain using observable indicators can be challenging for clinicians due to the subjective perceptions, individual differences in pain expression, and potential confounding factors. Therefore, the need for an objective pain assessment method that can assist medical practitioners. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has shown promising results to assess the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using LSTM in combination with CNN and other DL neural networks [40,41], where CNN and LSTM are combined to extract the features from complex brain patterns for more precise classification, obtained enhanced performance of fusion of DL models at the cost of increased processing and computational time. Fernandez Rojas et al [42] present a hybrid CNN-LSTM model with an accuracy of 91.2 ± 11.7, compared to 86.4 ± 16.8 and 88.4 ± 21.1 for the CNN and LSTM models, respectively. Md.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using LSTM in combination with CNN and other DL neural networks [40,41], where CNN and LSTM are combined to extract the features from complex brain patterns for more precise classification, obtained enhanced performance of fusion of DL models at the cost of increased processing and computational time. Fernandez Rojas et al [42] present a hybrid CNN-LSTM model with an accuracy of 91.2 ± 11.7, compared to 86.4 ± 16.8 and 88.4 ± 21.1 for the CNN and LSTM models, respectively. Md.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%