2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical distributions of Chinese stock returns at different microscopic timescales

Abstract: We study the distributions of event-time returns and clock-time returns at different microscopic timescales using ultra-high-frequency data extracted from the limit-order books of 23 stocks traded in the Chinese stock market in 2003. We find that the returns at the one-trade timescale obey the inverse cubic law. For larger timescales (2-32 trades and 1-5 minutes), the returns follow the Student distribution with power-law tails. With the decrease of timescale, the tail becomes fatter, which is consistent with … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
58
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data contain ultra-high-frequency data of 23 liquid stocks listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2003 [12]. We find that the results for different stocks are qualitatively similar.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Our data contain ultra-high-frequency data of 23 liquid stocks listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2003 [12]. We find that the results for different stocks are qualitatively similar.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In some cases, the power law is also manifest in the trading volumes and volatilities. Furthermore, student t and stretched exponential distributions are proved to be well modeled in some ranges [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The auto-correlation function of returns fluctuates around zero. The power-law exponent of the simulated returns is estimated to be 2.96, close to the so-called inverse cubic law [63,64,65,66].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%