2016
DOI: 10.2138/am-2016-5730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical electronic polarizabilities of ions for the prediction and interpretation of refractive indices: Oxides and oxysalts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
121
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach can be used to calculate the oxide anion polarizability according to the following equation: αO2=αo×10N0Vans where αo is the free‐ion polarizability and V an is the anion molar volume (calculated from the molar volume V m divided by the number of O 2− ). Different values for the exponent s starting from 0.66 up to 1.2 have been used by others for calculating the αO2. In the present work, it is found that a value of s = 0.899 is the best to give values of αO2 comparable with those calculated using Equation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach can be used to calculate the oxide anion polarizability according to the following equation: αO2=αo×10N0Vans where αo is the free‐ion polarizability and V an is the anion molar volume (calculated from the molar volume V m divided by the number of O 2− ). Different values for the exponent s starting from 0.66 up to 1.2 have been used by others for calculating the αO2. In the present work, it is found that a value of s = 0.899 is the best to give values of αO2 comparable with those calculated using Equation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static and dynamic polarizabilities show similar effects but dynamic polarizabilities are more useful because significantly more dynamic polarizability data are available. In Shannon and Fischer, using dynamic polarizabilities obtained from refractive indices determined at λ = 589.3 nm ( n D ) from a more extensive list of compounds, we identified more sterically strained structures such as Na 4.4 Ca 3.8 Si 6 O 18 (combeite), Ca 3 MgSi 2 O 8 (merwinite), NaScSi 2 O 6 (jervisite), Ca 2 Al 3 Si 3 O 12 OH (clinozoisite), and CaSO 4 (anhydrite). More recently, systematic deviations were also found in the SS compounds M 2+ SO 4 · n H 2 O, blödite (Na 2 M 2+ (SO 4 ) 2 ·4H 2 O), and kieserite‐related minerals (see ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Shannon and Fischer have evaluated ≈2600 dynamic polarizabilities derived from the refractive indices n D , of ≈1200 minerals and 675 synthetic compounds to yield a unique set of individual electronic polarizabilities of ions which can be used for the interpretation of optical properties. The total polarizabilities of a compound can be calculated from the observed refractive indices using the Anderson–Eggleton relationship …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations