2018
DOI: 10.5194/cp-2018-154
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical estimate of the signal content of Holocene temperature proxy records

Abstract: Abstract. Proxy records from climate archives provide evidence about past climate changes, but the recorded signal is affected by non-climate related effects as well as time uncertainty. As proxy based climate reconstructions are frequently used to test climate models and to quantitatively infer past climate, we need to improve our understanding of the proxy records’ signal content as well as the uncertainties involved. In this study, we empirically estimate signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of temperature proxy r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should increase the probability of the proxy predictors constraining the pool of potential analogues (compare the results in Appendix A1). Often such consistency is an implicit or explicit assumption (compare, e.g., Reschke et al, 2018). On the 30 other hand, the analogue approach, in theory, should allow using different parameters and calibrations if the comparison is to the same target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This should increase the probability of the proxy predictors constraining the pool of potential analogues (compare the results in Appendix A1). Often such consistency is an implicit or explicit assumption (compare, e.g., Reschke et al, 2018). On the 30 other hand, the analogue approach, in theory, should allow using different parameters and calibrations if the comparison is to the same target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly here, we assume that all the different recorders, aquatic or otherwise, 15 represent temperature at the surface. This is an assumption of convenience in view of potential habitat biases of the proxy records (Telford et al, 2013;Tierney and Tingley, 2015;Kučera, 2017, 2018;Rebotim et al, 2017;Tierney and Tingley, 2018;Dolman and Laepple, 2018;Reschke et al, 2018;Kretschmer et al, 2016Kretschmer et al, , 2018Malevich et al, 2019;Tierney et al, 2019). 4 https://doi.org /10.5194/cp-2019-170 Preprint.…”
Section: Variable Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such proxy records reveal imprints of past climatic conditions created by, for example, impacts on the calcification of the shells of marine organisms (Nürnberg et al, 1996), now preserved in sea sediments, on terrestrial pollen assemblages archived in lake sediments (Birks and Seppä, 2004), or on stable water isotopes that can be recovered from ice cores (Jouzel et al, 1997). Proxy-based reconstructions, however, are associated with notable uncertainties that are often much larger than those of instrumental data (Münch and Laepple, 2018;Reschke et al, 2019) and that can emerge from a variety of sources -they are essentially highly noisy and distorted observations of selected climate variables. Hence, an important task of the paleoclimate research field is to pro-vide thorough quantitative estimates of these reconstruction uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that a careful and systematic investigation of these reconstruction uncertainties is indispensable if we are to properly exploit the source of information contained in proxy archives, for such important issues like the estimation of the future evolution of natural and forced climate variability. Until now, however, reconstruction uncertainty estimates have often lacked the required accuracy (Lohmann et al, 2013;Reschke et al, 2019). In particular, one issue that deserves more detailed consideration is the timescale dependence of the reconstruction uncertainties (Amrhein, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%