2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
427
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 785 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
427
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nepal et al (2010), for example, find that improved cook stoves in Nepal do not yield reductions in the demand for firewood. Sorrell et al (2009) provide a more detailed review of literature in relation to the rebound effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nepal et al (2010), for example, find that improved cook stoves in Nepal do not yield reductions in the demand for firewood. Sorrell et al (2009) provide a more detailed review of literature in relation to the rebound effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies of the direct rebound mainly cover automotive transport, household heating and cooling in OECD countries. They estimate that usually between 10 and 30 percent of energy savings derived from more efficient technology are offset by the direct rebound effect (Greening, et al, 2000;Sorrell et al, 2009). …”
Section: Rebound Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savings can be overestimated with examples of 28% [50] and 36% ± 8% attributing this to increased comfort amongst other reasons [51]. Other total direct rebound effects have shown to be in the range of 10-30% [52,53]. Increases in temperature can vary considerably and depends on the level of under-heating prior to retrofit [8,54,55], though these increases are generally reasonably low (1 • C or less).…”
Section: Occupantsmentioning
confidence: 99%