2015
DOI: 10.2174/1874401x01508010013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Estimation of Accumulation-Induced Change in Gill Net Catchability: Mind the Observation Errors

Abstract: Abstract:We analyzed cumulative catches for 24 h gill net exposures divided into 4*6 h, 2*12 h and 1*24 h soak time treatments to estimate the reduction in its catchability due to accumulation of fish. The effects of loss of catch during net lifting, disturbance effect and fouling were eliminated as far as possible to reveal the true effect of accumulation. First we applied simple nonparametric and parametric tests in comparison of treatments. As expected, considerable reduction in catchability took place alon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the invasive, laborious, and expensive nature of gillnet sampling, limitations include its dependency on fish activity, differences in the catchability of species [ 92 ], underestimation of small size classes [ 69 ], and the fact that catch data indicate only relative abundance [ 27 , 28 , 93 ]. The efficacy of the method can be influenced by mesh congestion, declining as the number of fish trapped increases [ 94 , 95 ]. During daytime in clear water, even small numbers of entangled fish can reduce further catch significantly [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the invasive, laborious, and expensive nature of gillnet sampling, limitations include its dependency on fish activity, differences in the catchability of species [ 92 ], underestimation of small size classes [ 69 ], and the fact that catch data indicate only relative abundance [ 27 , 28 , 93 ]. The efficacy of the method can be influenced by mesh congestion, declining as the number of fish trapped increases [ 94 , 95 ]. During daytime in clear water, even small numbers of entangled fish can reduce further catch significantly [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is difficult to sample with gillnets the smallest and the largest fish, the correlation would have more significant in excluding these sizes. Furthermore, bias induced by accumulation of fish during gillnet sampling must be taken into account to avoid reduction in its catchability (Marjomäki, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%