2011 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical and Computer Technology 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icetect.2011.5760220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical evaluation of distance measures for supervised classification of remotely sensed image with Modified Multivariate Local Binary Pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of components, which corresponds to the intervals of intensities taken into account, is a parameter to be defined using a training set, for example. With this approach, the degree of similarity between the reference and target images is obtained by comparing their respective histograms using an adapted measure, like the Bhattacharyya distance [20] or X 2 (Chi-Square) [15].…”
Section: Color Histogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of components, which corresponds to the intervals of intensities taken into account, is a parameter to be defined using a training set, for example. With this approach, the degree of similarity between the reference and target images is obtained by comparing their respective histograms using an adapted measure, like the Bhattacharyya distance [20] or X 2 (Chi-Square) [15].…”
Section: Color Histogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The tracking process is based on the Mean-Shift algorithm 7 which allows to dene the region of interest in which we compare the histograms of the reference image and the target image.…”
Section: Histogram Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples on such situations where a considerable better classification accuracy have been obtained by applying some other distance measure have been reported in several articles i.e. [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [31]. However, typically in these types of studies one has simply tested with a few different distance measure for classifying the data set at hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%