1960
DOI: 10.1037/h0041113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical findings and theoretical problems in the use of anxiety scales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
116
1

Year Published

1961
1961
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
12
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When limited to 3 sec for responding, high-anxious subjects were apparently unable to take full advantage of the more effective encoding. Conceivably, anxious subjects are more likely to divide their attention between internal and external cues; consequently, their performance is more likely to suffer when time or other constraints are imposed (e.g., Marlett & Watson, 1968;Sarason, 1960;Wine, 1971). Thus, if the present interpretation is correct, the performance deficits normally associated with high anxiety can be eliminated if subjects are pretrained in using an effective encoding strategy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When limited to 3 sec for responding, high-anxious subjects were apparently unable to take full advantage of the more effective encoding. Conceivably, anxious subjects are more likely to divide their attention between internal and external cues; consequently, their performance is more likely to suffer when time or other constraints are imposed (e.g., Marlett & Watson, 1968;Sarason, 1960;Wine, 1971). Thus, if the present interpretation is correct, the performance deficits normally associated with high anxiety can be eliminated if subjects are pretrained in using an effective encoding strategy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Anxiety is thought to be greater on a subjectively important test than on an unimportant test. In construct validation studies, anxiety is detrimental to performance in highly motivating conditions only (Sarason, 1960). A factor analytic item analysis of a test anxiety questionnaire (Sassenrath, 1964) yielded different factors for items about course exams, items about group IQ tests, and items about individual IQ tests.…”
Section: Bruce Bloxom Educational Testing Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been conducted within a variety of frames of reference, ranging from construct validation studies (~eviewed by Sarason, 1960) to developmental studies (Sarason, Davidson, Lighthall, Waite, & Ruebush, 1960) to factor analytic studies (Feld & Lewis, 1967;Sassenrath, 1964) to desensitization therapy studies (Cohen, 1967; Katahn, strenger, & Cherry, 1966). Perhaps it is appropriate to consider integrating some of these frames of reference by examining variables which they have in common and by combining variables which are specific to different points of viffi<.…”
Section: Bruce Bloxom Educational Testing Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of a suggestion by Sarason (1960) that highly anxious individuals are more sensitive to reinforccments than nonanxious individuals, test anxiety was expected to interact wlth performance similarity to produce attraction. Specifically, it was predicted that anxiety would be positively related to attraction toward similar strangers and negatively related to attraction toward dissimilar strangers.…”
Section: Addition Anxiety Had the Same Influenee On Uther Fudgments mentioning
confidence: 99%