2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Grounding of Design Science Research Methodology

Abstract: Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to empirically ground design science research methodology (DSR). We claim that popular DSR methodologies lack solid empirical grounding since they are based on reconstructions of studies conducted for other purposes. Thus, we have systematically collected methodology users' empirical experiences and reflections from DSR projects. The overall findings show that the experiences are mainly positive. However, there are negative experiences such as the guidelines' granularity,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For theoretical grounding, the knowledge base used in this paper incorporated widely understood functional requirements techniques based upon UML, and structuration and semiotic theories, also used extensively [32]. Internal grounding means to have logical consistency [18], a clearly described and reusable process. The stages the DSRM applied for this research provided the apparatus for logical consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For theoretical grounding, the knowledge base used in this paper incorporated widely understood functional requirements techniques based upon UML, and structuration and semiotic theories, also used extensively [32]. Internal grounding means to have logical consistency [18], a clearly described and reusable process. The stages the DSRM applied for this research provided the apparatus for logical consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research also aligns to the recognized challenge associated with tacit knowledge when developing software [5,21,45,50] and asks the following Research Question (RQ): how can tacit knowledge be obtained and managed in order to contribute to functional requirements modeling? To answer the RQ, the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) [6,7,24,28,39] empirically grounds the research undertaken [18,27]. The DSRM incorporated input from end-users, a requirements engineer (also the researcher), and the Unified Modeling Language (UML) to change unwanted circumstances into better ones during a software development project for a client.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conduct our research, we followed the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) (Peffers et al 2007, Cronholm andGöbel 2015). DSRM is a methodology that provides guidelines for researchers to conduct research in information systems based on the principles, practices, and procedures required in design science.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we propose a design theory for EMS that includes the kernel theory, meta-requirements, meta-design, and empirical propositions for meta-design validation. 26, 36 The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) 37 and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) 38 are presented as the kernel theories for design guidance. Next, we explore the meta-requirements—the class of goals informed by kernel theory.…”
Section: Evidence-based Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%