2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.09.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical inference of in situ wafer sagging in Si epitaxy using pocket susceptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test wafer comprises a 27-min hydrogen bake at 1150 1C and a 13-min deposition at 1135 1C. The transfer pattern is due to the reactive transfer of the susceptor coating to the contacting wafer surface [9,10]. The ring pattern is uniquely related to the growth schedule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test wafer comprises a 27-min hydrogen bake at 1150 1C and a 13-min deposition at 1135 1C. The transfer pattern is due to the reactive transfer of the susceptor coating to the contacting wafer surface [9,10]. The ring pattern is uniquely related to the growth schedule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a, the slip extent is high in the area where sagging is impeded [3]. Here, the contact extension rate is inferred from the backside transfer pattern [10][11][12]. Each tree-ring denotes a period of 1 min deposition and 5 min purge.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%