The Economics of Education 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815391-8.00001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical methods in the economics of education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the investigation took place in a short period during the pandemic, the results cannot be applied in another context (pre-and postpandemic). The difference in different methodology can be used to make comparisons over time [106]. Further research could apply this method to examine the variation in customers' perspectives towards CSR and its effect on brand attitude and purchase intent before, during, and after crises.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the investigation took place in a short period during the pandemic, the results cannot be applied in another context (pre-and postpandemic). The difference in different methodology can be used to make comparisons over time [106]. Further research could apply this method to examine the variation in customers' perspectives towards CSR and its effect on brand attitude and purchase intent before, during, and after crises.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, we sought to compare the regression coefficients across activities (models) as evidence of change in the collaborative effect over physics grades. We further checked the robustness of our findings by following difference-and-difference [65] procedure and tested whether the observed differences in the collaborative effects hold (see Supplementary Material). We found no contradicting evidence from this analysis.…”
Section: B Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this concern leads to the problem of self-selection. To solve the endogeneity problem and estimate the causal effects of education, a common approach has been to use randomised controlled trials (RCT) or to exploit natural experiments and use quasiexperimental methods, such as instrumental-variable (IV), regression discontinuity (RD), or difference-in-differences (DD) approaches (Card, 1999;Webbink, 2005;Schwerdt and Woessmann, 2020). The former approach has ethical issues and is costly to conduct in educational research, thus, papers focus on the latter quasiexperimental methods.…”
Section: Causal Estimates Of Returns To Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the causal effects of higher education for high-income countries are estimated in the literature (Webbink, 2007;Maurin and McNally, 2008;Heckman et al, 2018;Gunderson and Oreopolous, 2020), papers on the causal estimates of economic returns to education for low-and middle-income countries are scarce due to the unavailability of appropriate data (Arteaga, 2018;Patrinos and Psacharopoulos, 2020). Natural experiments are a useful tool to evaluate such causal effects (Card, 1999;Webbink, 2005;Schwerdt and Woessmann, 2020). In Russia, the Bologna reform transformed higher education programmes from 5 to 4 years, while some programmes were not affected by the reform, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%