1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.22.1081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EmpiricalNDPotential and Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson Poles in the Pion-NucleonP11State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the P 11 partial wave a numerically large contribution of the nucleon pole graph to the potential makes it impossible for the solution (8) to exist without a CDD pole. Similar findings were discussed previously in models [54,55] also based on a single-channel approximation. After inclusion of one CDD pole, we can reproduce the P 33 partial wave with only the zeroth order coefficient in the expansion (21).…”
Section: πN Elastic Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the P 11 partial wave a numerically large contribution of the nucleon pole graph to the potential makes it impossible for the solution (8) to exist without a CDD pole. Similar findings were discussed previously in models [54,55] also based on a single-channel approximation. After inclusion of one CDD pole, we can reproduce the P 33 partial wave with only the zeroth order coefficient in the expansion (21).…”
Section: πN Elastic Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The decomposition of the contributions of the single-particle exchange diagrams into long and short-range components has allowed us to tackle the problem of the divergence of the kernel of the integral equation for N or D. This procedure seems more reasonable and less arbitrary than the cut-off procedure. The advantage of using the Chew-Mandelstam method in dealing with inelasticity is that it requires a smaller number of CDD poles than the Frye-Warnock method when applied to the $11-P~I amplitude (or no CDD poles at all) [9]. The idea of a resonant form for the inelasticity function R(W) near the inelastic threshold is crucial for obtaining the Roper resonance and a satisfactory P-wave fit ifCDD poles are to be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%