Hilbert transform x k (m) the m th component of the k th measurement in IMOs y,α,υ,(υ 1 ) heave, pitch, and NES (NES1) modes, respectively y km) (c m (k) ) the m th component of the k th measurement for an analytical (empirical) model θ k (m) instantaneous slow phase of an IMF c m (k) ζ k (m) damping factor of an IMO Λ k (m) nonlinear modal interaction θ k (m) (ω m (k) ) instantaneous phase (frequency) of an IMF c m (k) ϕ k (m) (A m (k) slow envelope for an analytical (empirical) model ψ k (m) (ψ m (k) ) complexification of the variables for an analytical (empirical) model ω m time-invariant fast frequency value for the m th component CX-A complexification-averaging technique DOF degree-of-freedom EMD empirical mode decomposition FEP frequency-energy plot IMF (IMO) intrinsic mode function (oscillator)
ABSTRACTWe revisit our earlier study of targeted energy transfer (TET) mechanisms for aeroelastic instability suppression by employing timedomain nonlinear system identification based on the equivalence between analytical and empirical slow flows. Performing multiscale partitions of the dynamics directly on measured (or simulated) time series without any presumptions regarding the type and strength of the system nonlinearity, we derive nonlinear interaction models (NIMs) as sets of intrinsic modal oscillators (IMOs). The eigenfrequencies of IMOs are characterised by the 'fast' dynamics of the problem and their forcing terms represent slowly-varying nonlinear modal interactions across the different time scales of the dynamics. We demonstrate that NIMs not only provide information on modal energy exchanges under nonlinear resonant interactions, but also directly dictate robustness behaviour of TET mechanisms for suppressing aeroelastic instabilities. Finally, we discuss the usefulness of NIMs in constructing frequency-energy plots that reveal global features of the dynamics to distinguish between different TET mechanisms and to study robustness of aeroelastic instability suppression.