2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical models of bridge seismic fragility surface considering the vertical effect of near-fault ground motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fragility curve could be established as a conditional probability table in which the structural requirement exceeds its capability under a given ground motion intensity (IM). 4,5,24 The calculation formula is as follows:…”
Section: Selection Of the Damage Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fragility curve could be established as a conditional probability table in which the structural requirement exceeds its capability under a given ground motion intensity (IM). 4,5,24 The calculation formula is as follows:…”
Section: Selection Of the Damage Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with far-fault earthquakes, near-fault earthquakes have three main features of ground motions: directional effect, velocity pulse-like effect, and vertical acceleration effect. 4,5 In some earthquakes, the rupture velocity of faults is close to the shear speed of the soil layer, resulting in the superposition of waves caused by the fault fracture and earthquake propagation in the soil layer, forming pulse-like earthquakes. The superposition of a fault rupture wave and earthquake energy in seismic causes an energy surge, which leads to the emergence of a velocity pulse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, the higher the damage state was, the more signi cant the impact was. Shao et al [2] established the vulnerable earthquake surface under the joint action of horizontal ground motion and VGM by simulating a simply supported bridge model. On this basis, the di erence between the damage probability a ected by VGM and that not a ected by VGM was analyzed, and the sensitive intervals of di erent damage states were determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study has the following shortcomings: (1) Only the influence of pier separation on the bending failure of the pier is calculated, and other possible losses are ignored. (2) e longitudinal deformation response only considers the deformation caused by longitudinal excitation and ignores the effect of eccentric vertical compression on the longitudinal deformation of the pier. To analyze the influence of pier height on the dynamic response of bridges, this paper focuses on the following points: (1) Effect of pier size on structure separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%