1999
DOI: 10.1109/34.790427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical performance evaluation of graphics recognition systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(7)) following the steps of Ref. [24] and correspond to the number of one-to-one, g_one-to-many, g_many-to-one, d_one-to-many, and d_many-to-one, respectively. A global performance metric for text line detection can be defined if we combine the values of detection rate and recognition accuracy.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7)) following the steps of Ref. [24] and correspond to the number of one-to-one, g_one-to-many, g_many-to-one, d_one-to-many, and d_many-to-one, respectively. A global performance metric for text line detection can be defined if we combine the values of detection rate and recognition accuracy.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful system must both determine the type of each entity present and recover a sufficiently accurate spatial description, ensuring that each reported entity is correctly located, both in absolute coordinates and in relation to neighbouring entities. These two issues of classification and spatial coherence are, for example, both explicitly addressed by current [8] performance evaluation schemes. Initial examination of the KADS/CommonKADS model library suggests that, given these goals, models describing classification and configuration tasks are the most relevant.…”
Section: Models Of Expertise: Classification Vs Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of the paper ballot grabbed using ultraviolet light of neuronal nets like it is shown for instance in [7]. Structural methods have been also proposed like in [8] [9]. Finally, several authors proposed methods that combine different techniques [10].…”
Section: Optical Character Recognition Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%