2005
DOI: 10.1364/ao.44.003795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical relationships between extinction coefficient and visibility in fog

Abstract: Relationships between visibility and an extinction coefficient that is due to fog in optical windows that are free from molecular absorption are derived. The extinction coefficients in the visible (0.55 microm), the near IR (1.2 microm), and the mid IR (3.7 microm) are comparable to and roughly twice as much as that in the far IR (10.6 microm) when visibility is less than a few hundred meters. The advantage of far-IR radiation compared with shorter wavelengths grows as visibility exceeds 500 m. Correspondingly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, we derive aerosol optical thickness at 550 nm from MODIS (MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) (retrieved from Giovanni (GES-DISC Interactive Online Visualization ANd aNalysis Infrastructure), Acker and Leptoukh, 2007) BLH (boundary layer height) to get the extinction coefficient. We then scale this extinction coefficient at 460 nm using the Angstrom coefficient as described in Nebuloni (2005), and derive visibility at this wavelength from the Koschmieder law (Koschmieder, 1926). The same approach to estimate the visibility will be used for the GEOS-R satellite (NOAA-NESDIS, 2010).…”
Section: Radiative Transfer and Assumptions On No 2 And Aerosol Extinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, we derive aerosol optical thickness at 550 nm from MODIS (MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) (retrieved from Giovanni (GES-DISC Interactive Online Visualization ANd aNalysis Infrastructure), Acker and Leptoukh, 2007) BLH (boundary layer height) to get the extinction coefficient. We then scale this extinction coefficient at 460 nm using the Angstrom coefficient as described in Nebuloni (2005), and derive visibility at this wavelength from the Koschmieder law (Koschmieder, 1926). The same approach to estimate the visibility will be used for the GEOS-R satellite (NOAA-NESDIS, 2010).…”
Section: Radiative Transfer and Assumptions On No 2 And Aerosol Extinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example (and many others not shown) shows that when the visibility (measured at 550 nm) drops below 1 km, the 20 m attenuated backscatter (measured at 910 nm) exceeds 2 × 10 −4 m −1 sr −1 . To compare, visibilityto-extinction parameterizations (e.g., Nebuloni, 2005) yield an extinction of about 3 × 10 −3 m −1 at 905 nm for a 550 nm visibility of 1 km (neglecting absorption by water vapor molecules). Because the extinction is strong in these conditions (scattering by droplets and absorption by water vapor), it is expected that the attenuated backscatter at higher altitudes (in the fog) will decrease quickly with increasing alti- tude.…”
Section: Step 3 (Alert Levels)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently FSO communication system is taken into consideration in research studies. This is because of its high data rate, bandwidth and security, in an unlicensed spectrum as well as easy and low cost installation [1] [2]. In contrast with these advantages, high sensitivity of FSO system to weather conditions and atmospheric turbulences limits its practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%