1978
DOI: 10.1109/jqe.1978.1069847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical relationships for predicting nonlinear refractive index changes in optical solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
130
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the increase of the NL response of the samples due to the increase in the WO 3 amount is attributed to the high polarizability associated with the W-O bonds. [12][13][14] The values of n 2 were calculated using the semiempirical method due to Boling, Glass and Owyung ͑BGO-model͒ 25 which assumes that the NL polarizability is proportional to the linear polarizability squared and the optical dispersion of the material is determined by a single resonance at ប 0 . The laser frequency, , is considered to be off-resonance ͑ Ͻ 0 ͒ and n 2 is given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the increase of the NL response of the samples due to the increase in the WO 3 amount is attributed to the high polarizability associated with the W-O bonds. [12][13][14] The values of n 2 were calculated using the semiempirical method due to Boling, Glass and Owyung ͑BGO-model͒ 25 which assumes that the NL polarizability is proportional to the linear polarizability squared and the optical dispersion of the material is determined by a single resonance at ប 0 . The laser frequency, , is considered to be off-resonance ͑ Ͻ 0 ͒ and n 2 is given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of gS = 4.6 was determined through the best data fitting and is close to previous values measured for oxide glasses. 25,26 The values of n 2 calculated via the BGO model are summarized in Table III. The agreement with the experimental values for samples A, B, and C is very good but the theoretical result for sample D is larger than the experimental value probably because the assumption of Ͻ 0 is violated and the relevant two-photon absorption process is not considered in the BGO model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on easily accessible physical parameters, the BGO model allows a estimation of n 2 that is correct within less than one order of magnitude in the case of multicomponent glasses. 4 In the low frequency limit (x(x 0 ) the BGO model leads to an expression of n 2 given by: 2,19,35 …”
Section: A Evaluation Of the Nonlinear Response In The Frame Of Bgo mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor gs has been found to be 3 in the case of materials with small nonlinear optical coefficients, while gs values in the range 1-2 provide a better agreement with experimental results in glasses presenting large nonlinear refractive indices. 4,19,36 In the present case we have considered the values of n at 550 nm and 1480 nm and a value of gs ¼ 1.5 6 0.5 to evaluate first Ns and x 0 and then n 2BGO at 800 nm. The theoretical values are included in Table IV Table IV) we observe that the model allows an accurate estimation in the case of bulk glasses but not for the films.…”
Section: A Evaluation Of the Nonlinear Response In The Frame Of Bgo mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boling et al (2003) had estimated γ or n 2 by suggesting an experimental formula as an approximation method as follows: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%