Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice

Abstract

BackgroundThe methodology of medical ethics during the last few decades has shifted from a predominant use of normative-philosophical analyses to an increasing involvement of empirical methods. The articles which have been published in the course of this so-called 'empirical turn' can be divided into conceptual accounts of empirical-normative collaboration and studies which use socio-empirical methods to investigate ethically relevant issues in concrete social contexts.DiscussionA considered reference to normative research questions can be expected from good quality empirical research in medical ethics. However, a significant proportion of empirical studies currently published in medical ethics lacks such linkage between the empirical research and the normative analysis. In the first part of this paper, we will outline two typical shortcomings of empirical studies in medical ethics with regard to a link between normative questions and empirical data: (1) The complete lack of normative analysis, and (2) cryptonormativity and a missing account with regard to the relationship between 'is' and 'ought' statements. Subsequently, two selected concepts of empirical-normative collaboration will be presented and how these concepts may contribute to improve the linkage between normative and empirical aspects of empirical research in medical ethics will be demonstrated. Based on our analysis, as well as our own practical experience with empirical research in medical ethics, we conclude with a sketch of concrete suggestions for the conduct of empirical research in medical ethics.SummaryHigh quality empirical research in medical ethics is in need of a considered reference to normative analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate how conceptual approaches of empirical-normative collaboration can enhance empirical research in medical ethics with regard to the link between empirical research and normative analysis.

Secondary use of empirical research data in medical ethics papers on gamete donation: forms of use and pitfalls

“…Different criteria may be needed depending on the purpose for which the data are used, as well as the theoretical framework for the empirical study, and the method used to integrate different forms of evidence in normative analyses (Sugarman and Sulmasy 2010). When the data play a central role in the argumentation, there is indeed a need for a description of the methods used for this interaction as well as a demonstration of how such interaction contributes to normative reasoning (Salloch et al 2012). But even before that, we may want some reassurance about the pertinence and the quality of the selected data, and the clarity of their role in the argument.…”

Impact of legislation and public funding on oncofertility: a survey of Canadian, French and Moroccan pediatric hematologists/oncologists

“…Finally, another limitation of our study is related to the conceptual complexity of linking normative analysis with empirical findings. While the use of empirical methods, mostly from the social sciences, has considerably increased in bioethics [56,57] there is heated debate on the appropriate ways to link this type of research with the normative work most bioethicists engage in [57][58][59]. "Empirical research attempts to describe the social world as it is, while normative research seeks to describe how the world ought to be."…”

End‐of‐Life Decisions and the Reinvented Rule of Double Effect: A Critical Analysis

“…They also indicate what kind of challenges policy-makers may encounter when suggesting changes to current guidelines, regulations etc. (Salloch et al 2012). Furthermore, as Loughlin puts it "[…] we need to know what people think, not as logical basis for conclusions but as a necessary starting point for our thinking" (Loughlin 2011:972).…”