2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.15918
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical temperature- and extinction-dependent extinction coefficients for the GALEX, Pan-STARRS1, Gaia, SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE passbands

Abstract: We have obtained accurate dust reddening from far-ultraviolet (UV) to the mid-infrared (IR) for up to 5 million stars by the star-pair algorithm based on LAMOST stellar parameters along with GALEX, Pan-STARRS 1, Gaia, SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE photometric data. The typical errors are between 0.01-0.03 mag for most colors. We derived the empirical reddening coefficients for 21 colors both in the traditional (single valued) way and as a function of T eff and E(B − V ) by using the largest samples of accurate reddeni… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stars are dereddened using the Schlegel et al (1998, hereafter SFD) dust reddening map. The reddening coefficients for the K − W1 and W1-W2 colors are empirically determined byZhang & Yuan (2022), which are 0.11 and 0.056, respectively. With the sample above, by considering both the selection efficiency and completeness, we set the new criterion to be (W1-W2) 0 > −0.392 × (K − W1) 0 − 0.017, as shown in Figure1; it yields a success rate of 46% and a completeness of 84% for the sample used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stars are dereddened using the Schlegel et al (1998, hereafter SFD) dust reddening map. The reddening coefficients for the K − W1 and W1-W2 colors are empirically determined byZhang & Yuan (2022), which are 0.11 and 0.056, respectively. With the sample above, by considering both the selection efficiency and completeness, we set the new criterion to be (W1-W2) 0 > −0.392 × (K − W1) 0 − 0.017, as shown in Figure1; it yields a success rate of 46% and a completeness of 84% for the sample used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%