Empirical Urban Theory for Archaeologists

Abstract

I review several bodies of empirical urban theory relevant to the archaeological analysis of ancient cities. Empirical theory is a type of "middlerange theory" (following Robert Merton): sets of concepts and methods that are less abstract, and have greater empirical content, than high-level social theory. The categories of theory reviewed here include environment-behavior theory, architectural communication theory, space syntax, urban morphology, reception theory, generative planning theory, normative theory, and city size theory. Most of these approaches originated in the fields of architecture, planning, and geography, and they directly link the urban-built environment to the actions of people within cities.Keywords Urbanism . Theory . Planning . Middle-range theory . Built environment Archaeological research on ancient cities and urbanism exhibits a wide range of perspectives on the use of theory. Some archaeologists pursue descriptive research with little explicit use of theory, while others embrace high-level social theory. Still others chart a course between these poles by using lower-level concepts. Work in this latter category is more abstract than empirical description but more grounded and less abstract than high-level social theory. I call this body of work "empirical urban theory," and in this paper I argue that this is an especially productive explanatory approach for understanding ancient cities and urban life. In defining "theory" I follow anthropologist Roy Ellen, who states that theories, provide us with a framework through which we can explain and interpret data, and they should do so parsimoniously. So, we might define theory as 'A supposition or body of suppositions designed to explain phenomena or data' (Ellen 2010: 390).

8 Neighborhood as Nexus: A Trans‐historical Approach to Emplaced Communities

“…Residential propinquity and spaces that coordinate activities (Canuto and Yaeger ) in neighborhoods lead to shared identities, whether self‐consciously realized or not. This characterization of neighborhood draws on Smith and Novic's (; but see also M. E. Smith , , , ) definition of neighborhoods as bottom‐up, face‐to‐face social formations that are smaller than and distinct from administratively defined “districts.” In the context of urban settlements, this characterization accords with Keith's (; see also Smith and Novic ) observation that neighborhoods come into being through interaction, as opposed to geographical circumscription by higher‐level authorities.…”

Social Complexity, Inner Asia, and Pastoral Nomadism

“…Zhukovskaya 1984;Sodnompilova 2005). Middle range theories (Merton 1968) or empirical theories (Smith 2011) are theories that can be used to explain the phenomena of various levels but do not suit for the comprehensive interpretation of every social phenomenon without exception. In other words, it is a complex of instruments capable of interpreting a limited set of facts or phenomena (Hedström, Udéhn 2009: 31).…”

The City Is Alive – Still! Comment on Bisserka Gaydarska, ‘The City Is Dead! Long Live the City!’

“…Furthermore, the article in my opinion opens doors and leaves them open: first, there is nothing new in stating the already well-known fact that the terms 'city' and 'urban' are too broadly formulated to act as effective definitional tools because of the need for a set of criteria to encompass pre-and proto-urban settlement variations that have existed across a long historical time and in a super-regional and global perspective. The overarching question of what constitutes a 'town' or a 'city' and relevant criteria to define and describe various types of organized and densely populated places have been discussed many times in recent literature (see Monnet 2003, Smith 2011, Ortman et al 2014. These contributions present arguments, assessments and considerations crucial to the topic that is the focus of her article.…”