2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/systems.2008.4518999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Validation of Design Principles for Survivable System Architecture

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several design approaches that propose frameworks for addressing system survivability that include both (1) the integrated engineering framework (Ellison et al 1997) and (2) the bio-networking architecture (Nakano and Suda 2007). However, the most impressive work has been done by Mathew Richards and his colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Richards et al 2008(Richards et al , 2009 in which they focus on the development of design principles that address each of the three survivability elements. Table 11.7 displays the three survivability elements and the associated design principles that may be invoked when addressing survivability as a purposeful activity during system design endeavors.…”
Section: Survivability In Systems Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several design approaches that propose frameworks for addressing system survivability that include both (1) the integrated engineering framework (Ellison et al 1997) and (2) the bio-networking architecture (Nakano and Suda 2007). However, the most impressive work has been done by Mathew Richards and his colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Richards et al 2008(Richards et al , 2009 in which they focus on the development of design principles that address each of the three survivability elements. Table 11.7 displays the three survivability elements and the associated design principles that may be invoked when addressing survivability as a purposeful activity during system design endeavors.…”
Section: Survivability In Systems Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the generation of survivable design alternatives, seventeen survivability design principles spanning susceptibility reduction, vulnerability reduction, and resilience enhancement techniques were empirically-derived from military and commercial aerospace systems. 4,5 To improve the evaluation of survivability in tradespaces, metrics were developed to assess survivability as a dynamic, continuous, and path-dependent system property. 6 These respective efforts enable consideration of survivability strategies that prevent losses across the entire disturbance lifecycle and an ability to rapidly filter thousands of design alternatives in tradespace studies.…”
Section: A Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, seventeen empirically-validated survivability design principles 4,5 are consulted to inform the generation of system concepts that mitigate the impact of each disturbance. Each design principle provides a concept-neutral architectural strategy for achieving survivability.…”
Section: Phase 4: Apply Survivability Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate survivability considerations into conceptual design, this paper introduces an approach for deploying an existing set of seventeen survivability design principles during concept generation (Richards et al 2008a). As discussed in previous work, the intent of the design principles is to enhance concept generation by expanding the set of system design tradeoffs under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from these iterative mappings identified missing design principles and taxonomic imprecision in design principle definitions-informing an expanded set of seventeen design principles. The design principle set stabilized in subsequent empirical tests (e.g., Iridium satellite system, F-16 combat aircraft) (Richards, Ross et al 2008a). Table 1 categorizes and defines the seventeen design principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%