2000
DOI: 10.1080/08832320009599006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirically Assessing the Importance of Characteristics of Accounting Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to the findings of several previous researches (Zaid and Abraham, 1994;Johnson and Johnson, 1995;Morgan, 1997;Lee and Blaszczynski, 1999;Baker andMcGregor, 2000, Abraham andJones, 2008) who found that generic skills (especially, ethical awareness and communication) are real keys success factors. The employers also ranked technical abilities as less important than soft skills.…”
Section: Employer Perceptionssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results are similar to the findings of several previous researches (Zaid and Abraham, 1994;Johnson and Johnson, 1995;Morgan, 1997;Lee and Blaszczynski, 1999;Baker andMcGregor, 2000, Abraham andJones, 2008) who found that generic skills (especially, ethical awareness and communication) are real keys success factors. The employers also ranked technical abilities as less important than soft skills.…”
Section: Employer Perceptionssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Generally, the literature indicates that attractive people are more favorable hires for management and management trainee positions than less attractive candidates are (Bardack and McAndrew, 1985;Cash and Kilcullen, 1985;Dipboye et al, 1975Dipboye et al, , 1977Gilmore et al, 1986;Johnson et al, 2010;Marlowe et al, 1996;Miller and Routh, 1985). Of relevance to the present study, students and industry representatives reported that level of attractiveness is a key factor in hiring decisions (Baker and McGregor, 2000). Attractiveness has even been found to overshadow appropriateness of attire in importance (Bardack and McAndrew, 1985).…”
Section: Overall Attractivenessmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The use of the GPA as a selection variable is controversial; however, when a job candidate has limited work experience, the GPA provides an apparently objective criterion to which recruiters can turn in screening applicants and establishing a candidate's potential (Kuncel et al, 2004;Posner, 1981). Although some studies suggest that overall GPA is not considered by industry to be an important selection criterion (Baker and McGregor, 2000;Guo et al, 2009;McKinney et al, 2003), there is support elsewhere for the proposition that GPA is used as a selection tool and may well be important when identifying a set of candidates to be interviewed (Roth and Bobko, 2000;Rynes et al, 1997). Additionally, Baker and McGregor (2000) found that, even though the value of the GPA varied among the five groups examined in their study, all groups maintained that GPA should be included in candidate analysis.…”
Section: Gpamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hall and Berdino (2006), who studied the perceptions of appropriate professional behaviors of business school faculty, students, and human resource managers, found significant differences between the groups pertaining to the practice of requiring professional dress during class presentations as well as to the role that faculty members play in counseling students on the propriety or advisability of body/facial piercings. Numerous studies, in both hospitality-related and non-hospitality fields, have suggested that professional dress, appearance, and grooming are important or desired attributes for successful job candidates (Baker and McGregor, 2000;Christou, 2002;Fjelstul, 2007;Posner, 1981;Tas, 1988;Tesone and Ricci, 2005).…”
Section: Interview Attirementioning
confidence: 99%