2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
167
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
167
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To put the conventional growth (50% annual growth of electrolyzer capacity) of green-fuel capacity into context: historical solar PV capacity growth from 2009 to 2019 was between 24 and 89% per year, depending on the geographical region (low for EU, high for non-OECD); and historical wind-capacity growth from 2009–2019 was between 11 and 28% per year depending on the geographical region (low for EU, high for non-OECD) (BP, 2020). (For more details, see section 13 of the supplemental information , where we discuss different upscaling rates for capacities 50 ) However, suppose it becomes more and more apparent that electrolytic green fuels are the only solution to achieving a green transition in hard-to-abate sectors. In that case, growth rates beyond solar PV growth, which at the time (2009–2019) was not and still is not the single option to invest in to generate renewable electricity, might be expected to meet or even to exceed the 1.5°C (NZ 2050) emissions reduction target.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To put the conventional growth (50% annual growth of electrolyzer capacity) of green-fuel capacity into context: historical solar PV capacity growth from 2009 to 2019 was between 24 and 89% per year, depending on the geographical region (low for EU, high for non-OECD); and historical wind-capacity growth from 2009–2019 was between 11 and 28% per year depending on the geographical region (low for EU, high for non-OECD) (BP, 2020). (For more details, see section 13 of the supplemental information , where we discuss different upscaling rates for capacities 50 ) However, suppose it becomes more and more apparent that electrolytic green fuels are the only solution to achieving a green transition in hard-to-abate sectors. In that case, growth rates beyond solar PV growth, which at the time (2009–2019) was not and still is not the single option to invest in to generate renewable electricity, might be expected to meet or even to exceed the 1.5°C (NZ 2050) emissions reduction target.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, growth rates beyond solar PV growth, which at the time (2009–2019) was not and still is not the single option to invest in to generate renewable electricity, might be expected to meet or even to exceed the 1.5°C (NZ 2050) emissions reduction target. 50 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically grounded technology forecasts call for a rapid transition towards a decarbonized, global energy supply. Scenarios are outlined which may become critical for addressing climate change while at the same time will likely result in trillions of dollars net energy cost savings [ 1 ]. Storage of intermittent, renewable energy is thereby considered a key technology for realizing the anticipated energy transition [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change is heading in the right direction, but well below the required pace generation may occur faster than projected(Way et al 2021), potentially improving this indicator toward being on track.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%