1993
DOI: 10.1016/0377-0273(93)90030-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emplacement history of a low-viscosity, fountain-fed pantelleritic lava flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To document textural variation throughout the exposed thickness of the Ben Lomond flow, the following physical parameters were measured: density, porosity, void aspect ratio, spherulite size, and microlite length, following the methods described in Stevenson et al (1993 information, together with the superposition of textures, can be used to document the sequence of events during the emplacement of the lava flow. For all textural parameters, measurements were taken from the top, middle, and base of each unit to be fully representative of any textural variation within each unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To document textural variation throughout the exposed thickness of the Ben Lomond flow, the following physical parameters were measured: density, porosity, void aspect ratio, spherulite size, and microlite length, following the methods described in Stevenson et al (1993 information, together with the superposition of textures, can be used to document the sequence of events during the emplacement of the lava flow. For all textural parameters, measurements were taken from the top, middle, and base of each unit to be fully representative of any textural variation within each unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possible mechanisms of magmatic banding, including magma segregation (Onikiyenko 1970), convection and fractionation in the magma reservoir (Geshi 1999;Weinberg et al 2001;Barbey et al 2008), magma fragmentation and then welding owing to the large shear rate of flowing magma (see Stevenson et al 1993;Smith 1996;Gonnermann & Manga 2005), shearing of mingled magma in turbulent flow (Seaman 1995;Perugini et al 2003a,b), repetition of fracturing and healing during magma ascent within a volcanic conduit (Tuffen et al 2003;Rust et al 2004), magma cooling inward from the contacts (Huppert & Sparks 1989), and so forth. In the study case, the banding is generally considered as a product of magma mingling (R. F. Weinberg, personal communication).…”
Section: Origin Of Magmatic Bandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These eruption styles have been attributed to the high viscosity of silicic magma. However, in some cases, silicic magma has been interpreted as erupting and behaving as low viscosity magma, such as basaltic magma (e.g., Stevenson et al, 1993) and the products are interpreted as spatter deposits and rheomorphic pyroclastic deposits (terminology after . In general, spatter is produced by strombolian and Hawaiian style fountaining events and deposits are characterized by fountain-fed (clastogenic) lavas and spatter cones and ramparts such as 1986 eruption of Izu-Oshima volcano (Sumner, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%