2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013gc004930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emplacement of the early Miocene Pinto Peak intrusion, Southwest Utah, USA

Abstract: [1] In this contribution, we report rock magnetic, petrographic, and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) data from the Pinto Peak intrusion, all of which bear on volcanic construction. Rock magnetic data indicate that the dominant magnetic mineral phase is low-Ti titanomagnetite of multidomain grain size, the composition of which varies spatially across the intrusion. The intrusion is a porphyritic andesite dominated by Ca-rich plagioclase (>60%) as well as biotite, amphibole, olivine, and opaque miner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) allows the rapid and precise measurement of magnetic fabrics from large sample sets (Tarling and Hrouda 1993). It is well established that magnetic lineations and foliations, particularly those reflecting the shape, orientation, and distribution of ferromagnetic minerals (e.g., magnetite), can record primary magma flow patterns in igneous bodies (e.g., Knight and Walker 1988;Archanjo et al 1995;de Saint-Blanquat et al 2006;Stevenson et al 2007a, b;Petronis and O'Driscoll 2013;McCarthy et al 2015a, b) and smaller sheet intrusions (Cañón-tapia and Chávez-Álvarez 2004;Féménias et al 2004;Philpotts and Philpotts 2007;Magee et al 2016). For example, discrete magma lobes have been interpreted within some plutons following recognition of narrow zones comprising parallel fabrics that diverge outwards along-strike and then curve inwards to define bulbous terminations (e.g., Cruden et al 1999;Stevenson et al 2007a;Magee et al 2012b).…”
Section: Anisotropy Of Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) allows the rapid and precise measurement of magnetic fabrics from large sample sets (Tarling and Hrouda 1993). It is well established that magnetic lineations and foliations, particularly those reflecting the shape, orientation, and distribution of ferromagnetic minerals (e.g., magnetite), can record primary magma flow patterns in igneous bodies (e.g., Knight and Walker 1988;Archanjo et al 1995;de Saint-Blanquat et al 2006;Stevenson et al 2007a, b;Petronis and O'Driscoll 2013;McCarthy et al 2015a, b) and smaller sheet intrusions (Cañón-tapia and Chávez-Álvarez 2004;Féménias et al 2004;Philpotts and Philpotts 2007;Magee et al 2016). For example, discrete magma lobes have been interpreted within some plutons following recognition of narrow zones comprising parallel fabrics that diverge outwards along-strike and then curve inwards to define bulbous terminations (e.g., Cruden et al 1999;Stevenson et al 2007a;Magee et al 2012b).…”
Section: Anisotropy Of Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, contrasting interpretations of plutonic mineral fabrics as the recorders of magmatic flow or tectonic strain exist, even for similar intrusions and tectonic settings (e.g. Petronis and O'Driscoll, 2013;Tomek et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%