2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icmss.2011.5998064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee Behaviors, Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi, and Workplace Exclusion

Abstract: New-entry employees expect to be accepted rather than to be excluded after the organizational entry. The paper attempts to propose a model to examine the process through which employees can be exempt from exclusion in the organization as a "political arena". We argue that an employee, in order not to be excluded, would like to perform high-quality in-role and extra-role behaviors and also develop good guanxi with his or her supervisor. The study collects matched data including 343 employees, 662 colleagues, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach underscores individual differences, such as proactive personality (Zhang et al, 2015), and personal motives (Zhang et al, 2016). The third one identifies the impact of some external factors within organizational settings, for example, abusive supervision (Liu and Wang, 2011). These studies do explicate what impacts the quality of SSG; however, it is less clear why the subordinates will engage in building guanxi with their supervisors, say performing SSG-building behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach underscores individual differences, such as proactive personality (Zhang et al, 2015), and personal motives (Zhang et al, 2016). The third one identifies the impact of some external factors within organizational settings, for example, abusive supervision (Liu and Wang, 2011). These studies do explicate what impacts the quality of SSG; however, it is less clear why the subordinates will engage in building guanxi with their supervisors, say performing SSG-building behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, personal-life inclusion may detract from employees' valued resources (e.g., after-work time, energy, and money) which they need to fulfill their family duties and thus leads to higher-level turnover intention. The positive effect of SSG on Chinese employees' outcomes has been thoroughly studied and most of these studies have indicated its significant effect on commitment (Chen et al, 2009), trust in supervisor (Wong, Wong, & Wong, 2010), high levels of in-role performance (Cheng, Chiu, & Tzeng, 2013), and organizational citizenship behaviors (Liu & Wang, 2011;Zhang, Li, & Harris, 2015), while little is known about the negative impacts caused by SSG. This present study, to somewhat fill this gap, examined the positive relationship between personal-life inclusion and turnover intention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%