Employee engagement: exploring higher education non-tenure track faculty members’ perceptions

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study employee engagement in higher education by examining full-time non-tenure track faculty members’ perceptions at a North East US state public university. Design/methodology/approach The authors used semi-structured face-to-face personal interviews with 11 non-tenure track full-time university faculty. Using a phenomenological approach, thematic analysis was conducted for employee interview data. The data was further refined through first and second cycle coding. The primary eight coded clusters were further reduced to three data clusters, each representing an evolving unit of meaning. Findings The analysis revealed three themes relating to how full-time non-tenure track faculty experience and understand engagement: required institutional engagement, perceived necessary engagement and relational collegial engagement. Originality/value The study adds to the limited research available on non-tenure track faculty members within higher education organization and their perceptions of engagement.

Evolving approaches to employee engagement: comparing antecedents in remote work and traditional workplaces

“…While no widely agreed upon definition exists, the construct has evolved into a tripartite set of components, that is, physical, emotional and cognitive engagement, and has become oriented toward achieving desired organizational outcomes (Shuck et al , 2017). This concept’s components, antecedents and applications have continued to evolve (Kovaleski and Arghode, 2020; Shuck et al , 2017; Van and Nafukho, 2019; Saks and Gruman, 2014). In over 20 years of studies published in Human Resource Development Review, employee engagement was the second most commonly used keyword (Park, 2021).…”

Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context

“…Today’s leaders and HR managers prefer employees with strong employee engagement, which allows them to develop and retain talented people who can flexibly respond to and collaborate with changes in the corporate environment (Christian, Garza and Slaughter, 2011; Rich et al , 2010). To achieve these goals, strategic management through training and development to provide job value is necessary (Kovaleski and Arghode, 2020). In fact, successful businesses are investing more in education and human resource development than unsuccessful businesses (Kraiger, 2003) and corporate education lead to improved corporate performance, as well as personal achievements (Kozlowski and Klein, 2000).…”