Employee innovative behavior and workplace wellbeing: Leader support for innovation and coworker ostracism as mediators

Abstract

IntroductionMost previous studies focused on the antecedents of employee innovative behavior but rarely examined the outcomes of employee innovative behavior. Moreover, previous studies ignored the relationship between employee innovative behavior and workplace wellbeing. Based on social comparison theory and social exchange theory, this study introduces coworker ostracism and leader support for innovation as mediating variables to explore the “double–edged sword” effect of employee innovative behavior on workplace wellbeing.MethodsBased on a sample of 319 employees from Chinese companies, this study used SPSS 26.0 and MPLUS 8.3 to examine the hypotheses.ResultsEmpirical results demonstrate that (a) employee innovative behavior is directly and positively related to workplace wellbeing, (b) employee innovative behavior is indirectly and positively related to workplace wellbeing through leader support for innovation, and (c) the negative association between employee innovative behavior and workplace wellbeing via coworker ostracism is unsupported.DiscussionThe findings of this study enrich the literature by exploring the double-edged sword effect of employee innovative behavior on workplace wellbeing. The practical implications of this study are that leaders in organizations should give employees innovation support.

An Empirical Study Analyzing the Moderating Effect of Supervisor Support and Mediating Effect of Presenteeism among Eustress, Distress, and Innovative Behavior

“…Hence, more presenteeism has been mentioned by large values. To determine the innovative attitude of employees, Albort-Morant developed a questionnaire that consisted of 21 items with a Cronbach’s coefficient of 0.91 [ 37 ]. An employee’s innovative work behavior can be classified into three categories depending on how they operate: the innovation system (10 items), the competitors and technology (7 items), and new services (4 items).…”

The Influence of Fostering an Innovative Organisation Culture on Employee Engagement

“…Employees who are psychologically motivated and enabled will have a stronger willingness and desire to express purposeful behaviour (Spreitzer, 1995; Thomas & Velthouse, 1990). On the pretext of the Social Exchange Theory, it has been addressed in research as to how individuals seek support from their supervisors for facilitating an innovative work environment in exchange of favourable performance outputs to the organisation (Wang et al, 2022).…”

“…Employee performance can be significantly impacted by an innovative workplace culture. As individuals within an organisation are encouraged to think creatively and challenge the status quo, they tend to become more engaged, efficient and productive (Wang et al, 2022). This, in turn, directly translates into overall organisational productivity and efficiency, significantly improving the company’s competitive standing in the market.…”

Fostering Employee Customer-Oriented Boundary Spanning Behaviors: The Role of Inclusive Leadership

“…COBSBs requires FSEs not only follow the job descriptions to deliver quality customer service, but also engage in internal and external extra-role behaviors. To stimulate such behaviors, leaders have to take more efforts in building a more motivated work environment (Wang et al, 2022). To the best of our knowledge, only three papers have detected the impacts that spiritual leadership has on FSEs’ COBSBs from the perspective of workplace spirituality (Bayighomog & Arasli, 2022; Bayighomog & Araslı, 2019; Farmanesh et al, 2021), more attention is called for further investigation on this issue.…”