2001
DOI: 10.1002/job.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee's turnover intentions and job destination choices

Abstract: SummaryEmployee's job destination choices, as part of the turnover process, re¯ect options for internal organizational or external labor market moves. A sample of 477 employees in 15 ®rms was used to decipher how bio-demographic, job, plant, and labor market characteristics are related to ®ve alternative job destinations. Multivariate logistic regression and odds±ratio analyses compared the ®ve models con®rming that different sets of variables in¯uence each of the destination choices. Coworkers' intentions hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
49
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hom et al (2000) provide evidence that intentions to act precede and do serve as reasonable predictors of sensitive behaviors that usually cannot be directly measured. Also, organizational research through the years (George & Jones, 1996;Kirshenbaum & Weisberg, 2002;Lee & Mitchell, 1994;Steers & Mowday, 1981) effectively uses intentions as substitutes for actual behavior. The training and organizational behavior literatures are clear in their recognition of the importance of self-efficacy on intentions in several domains (Betz & Voyten, 1997;Waller, 2006;Zhao et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hom et al (2000) provide evidence that intentions to act precede and do serve as reasonable predictors of sensitive behaviors that usually cannot be directly measured. Also, organizational research through the years (George & Jones, 1996;Kirshenbaum & Weisberg, 2002;Lee & Mitchell, 1994;Steers & Mowday, 1981) effectively uses intentions as substitutes for actual behavior. The training and organizational behavior literatures are clear in their recognition of the importance of self-efficacy on intentions in several domains (Betz & Voyten, 1997;Waller, 2006;Zhao et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individuals who quit a job have a variety of destinations (Kirschenbaum & Weisberg, 2002), this model focuses on individuals who enact voluntary turnover to transition immediately to a job in a different organization. Before presenting the propositions that represent the relationships among the variables in Figure 1, we provide an overview of the model and its relationship to cybernetic theory.…”
Section: Model Of Job Search and Voluntary Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the prominent role of the ease of We thank associate editor David Lepak and three anonymous reviewers for their many insightful comments and guidance, which greatly improved the quality of this article. movement in turnover decisions has attracted increasing attention in the literature (Griffeth, Steel, Allen, & Bryan, 2005;Kirschenbaum & Weisberg, 2002;Lee et al, 2008;Steel, 2002;Swider, Boswell, & Zimmerman, in press;Trevor, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RN may change organization, but continue working in health care, referred to as organizational turnover, while another RN may leave the nursing field to work in a different industry, known as professional turnover. [12] Finally, an RN may leave the job market altogether and either become permanently unemployed or retired, referred to as involuntary turnover. Evidence from the job satisfaction literature clearly indicates that an RN's satisfaction with the job of nursing and satisfaction with the occupation of nursing are two distinct concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%