2014
DOI: 10.1504/ejim.2014.059581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employees' service recovery efforts as a function of perceptions of interactional justice in individualistic vs. collectivistic cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst there is substantial literature exploring the relationship between management practices and organisational justice, there is considerably less that researches the topic from an international perspective (Greenberg, 1993; Li and Cropanzano, 2009; McFarlin and Sweeney, 1992; Seger-Guttmann and MacCormick, 2014), particularly with regard to cross-border acquisitions (Luo, 2008; Meyer, 2001). Several studies have made use of the organisational theory in the context of large scale change situations (Brockner, 2002; Johnson et al , 2002; Konovsky, 2000; Korsgaard et al , 2002).…”
Section: Background Literature and Hypotheses Development[1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst there is substantial literature exploring the relationship between management practices and organisational justice, there is considerably less that researches the topic from an international perspective (Greenberg, 1993; Li and Cropanzano, 2009; McFarlin and Sweeney, 1992; Seger-Guttmann and MacCormick, 2014), particularly with regard to cross-border acquisitions (Luo, 2008; Meyer, 2001). Several studies have made use of the organisational theory in the context of large scale change situations (Brockner, 2002; Johnson et al , 2002; Konovsky, 2000; Korsgaard et al , 2002).…”
Section: Background Literature and Hypotheses Development[1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study builds on extant research that explored the link between perceptions of justice and commitment in a single country context (Ellis et al , 2009; Klendauer and Deller, 2009; Lowe and Vodanovich, 1995; Zhao et al , 2013). Whilst there is considerable literature investigating the relationship between organisational justice and management practices and, there is significantly less that studies the topic from an international viewpoint (Greenberg, 1993; Li and Cropanzano, 2009; McFarlin and Sweeney, 1992; Seger-Guttmann and MacCormick, 2014). The cross-border M&A context provides an ideal setting for extending organisational justice and commitment theory, because as argued by Chung et al (2014), the dynamics of cross-border M&As bring new factors such as cultural idiosyncrasies between host and home countries to bear on the association between organisational justice and commitment, which may result in cultural collusions (Angwin et al , 2016; Datta and Puia, 1995; Drori et al , 2011; Shimizu et al , 2004), that subsequently effect commitment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we contribute to the literature on self-construal and perceptions of justice. Evidence from social psychology and cross-cultural studies suggests that perceptions of justice differ as a function of self-construal (Gollwitzer and Bücklein, 2007;Holmvall and Sidhu, 2007;Smith and Citti, 2006) and that individuals from collectivistic cultures (more likely to have an interdependent self-construal) are more sensitive to violations of justice than individuals from individualistic cultures (Brockner et al, 2000;Cropanzano and Observations of others' service experiences Greenberg, 1997;Seger-Guttmann and MacCormick, 2014). Our research provides converging evidence for the role of self-construal in justice perceptions.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In another study on social justice, female participants who read about sexual harassment of a female student experienced a greater threat to their own self-concept when they were primed to think of themselves as part of a group rather than as unique individuals (Smith and Citti, 2006). Cross-cultural studies suggest that perceptions of justice differ between individuals from collectivistic vs individualistic cultures (Brockner et al, 2000;Cropanzano and Greenberg, 1997;Orsingher et al, 2010;Erdogan and Liden, 2006;Seger-Guttmann and MacCormick, 2014). Because collectivistic societies emphasize more group harmony and interdependence, they value more social norms (Lu, 2006) and are thus more sensitive to violations of justice compared to individualistic societies.…”
Section: The Role Of Perceived Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in Turkey with the high-power distance and the bureaucratic structure, the quality of relations with managers is more important than the perception of the procedures because of active figures of managers in the bureaucracy (Yurur, & Nart, 2016). In collectivist countries, group harmony, dependency on collective groups and loyalty are important (Seger-Guttmann, & MacCormick, 2014). The employees in these countries are composed of individuals with a high collectivist ideology and these individuals are more sensitive to the needs, feelings and behaviors of others (Wang, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%