2015
DOI: 10.1177/0261018315601040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employer orientation in the German public employment service

Abstract: Through the introduction of welfare states and social policy, owners of labour power acquired alternatives to the permanent sale of their labour. Entitlements to social security created the conditions for a strategic temporary withholding of labour. Based on qualitative data, this article presents empirical evidence of trends towards recommodification in Germany, i.e. a reduction in the possibilities for decommodification, as a result of a new employer orientation in the public employment service (PES). The fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maintaining good relations with employers is an important (although less studied) dimension of activating labor‐market policies. In the course of the Hartz reforms, the German labor administration increased its employer orientation (Sowa, Reims, & Theuer, ). Specific teams providing employer‐oriented services were established, the so‐called Employers Service ( Arbeitgeberservice ).…”
Section: Caseworker‐client Relations In the German Activation Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining good relations with employers is an important (although less studied) dimension of activating labor‐market policies. In the course of the Hartz reforms, the German labor administration increased its employer orientation (Sowa, Reims, & Theuer, ). Specific teams providing employer‐oriented services were established, the so‐called Employers Service ( Arbeitgeberservice ).…”
Section: Caseworker‐client Relations In the German Activation Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that these differences can be explained by various factors. First, the public employment service is known for its special tools for assessing refugees’ qualifications (OECD and UNHCR, 2018) as well as its preference of employers’ interests over jobseekers’ interests (Sowa et al, 2015; Torezani et al, 2008). Second, selectivity may exist among refugee jobseekers, which is, for instance, reflected in our finding that those who found a job via responding to a job ad have relatively high educational attainment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way neoliberal welfare states treat poor populations has been extensively demonstrated by studies from the United States, where the increase in social inequality and poverty rates go hand in hand with a dismantling of welfare state benefits and an increase of state repression and prosecution in order to control people effectively (Wacquant, 2009), including police state surveillance of neighborhoods where predominantly low-income and black communities live (Goffman, 2014). However, in the German context, despite an active labor market policy, the conservative welfare state still allows its citizens to receive social benefits, which has a decommodifying effect (Sowa et al, 2015). However, the conditions of welfare change with the loss of housing and a registered address.…”
Section: Urban Figurations Of Social Control or How The State Deals W...mentioning
confidence: 99%