The purpose of this study was to integrate traditional student success models with theories which focus on nontraditional students to create a model of early community college student success. The researcher sought to understand the pre-college behaviors, attitudes, and attributes, from both cognitive and noncognitive domains, which influence the success of first-time community college students enrolled in a developmental mathematics course. First-time community college students enrolled in Elementary Algebra (N=385) were surveyed on their educational goals, prior academic achievement, anticipated interactions during the first semester, and items from the Noncognitive Questionnaire (NCQ) (Sedlacek, 2004). Institutional data supplemented the survey variables as well as provided all dependent variables. Factor analyses were conducted to reduce the number of anticipatory variables. Descriptive statistics were reported for all dependent and independent variables. Both linear regression and logistic regression were utilized to examine the six research questions. Variables were entered into the regression equations in five blocks: demographics, college plans, prior mathematics achievement, anticipated experiences and interactions, and noncognitive variables. The model proved to be statistically significant in explaining each of the six dependent measures of student success. Moreover after controlling for the first four blocks of independent variables, six of the eight noncognitive variables reached statistical significance in its relationship to at least one dependent variable, with ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I want to thank my wife and children for their patience over the last six years-Daddy's finally done writing his paper! Thanks, Mom and Dad, for your unending encouragement and tuition assistance. Suzy, thanks for listening and sharing your graduate school "war stories"-you really helped me through some of my most challenging days as a Ph.D. student. Thank you to all my Kirkwood colleagues for their support. A special thanks to Bill Lamb and Al Rowe for securing funding to offset the cost of printing my survey; Sherri Erkel, Leanne Harman, Stacia Holub, and Jodie Stoessel for typesetting, printing, and binding my survey; and Anton Bosma for scanning my surveys and responding to my steady stream of requests for institutional data. Thanks also go to Alan Henkin for introducing me to this program and to Paul Umbach for helping narrow and clarify my research interest and guiding me through the early stages of my dissertation proposal. A tremendous thanks to my advisor, Mike Paulsen, the most caring, nurturing advisor a student could hope for. Mike, your incredibly thorough and constructive comments combined with your genuine excitement about my work made completing this study a joyful experience. I also want to thank the other members of my dissertation committee-David Bills, Debora Liddell, Ernie Pascarella, and Vilia Tarvydasfor their assistance and guidance with this study. v