Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3397271.3401153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employing Personal Word Embeddings for Personalized Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The meaning of a word can also vary across extralinguistic contexts such as time (Bybee, 2015;Koch, 2016) and social space (Robinson, 2010(Robinson, , 2012Geeraerts, 2018). To capture these phenomena, various types of dynamic word embeddings have been proposed: diachronic word embeddings for temporal semantic change (Bamler and Mandt, 2017;Rosenfeld and Erk, 2018;Rudolph and Blei, 2018;Yao et al, 2018;Gong et al, 2020) and personalized word embeddings for social semantic variation (Zeng et al, 2017(Zeng et al, , 2018Oba et al, 2019;Welch et al, 2020a,b;Yao et al, 2020). Other studies have demonstrated that performance on a diverse set of tasks can be increased by including temporal (Jaidka et al, 2018;Lukes and Søgaard, 2018) and social information (Amir et al, 2016;Hamilton et al, 2016a;Yang et al, 2016;Yang and Eisenstein, 2017;Hazarika et al, 2018;Mishra et al, 2018;del Tredici et al, 2019b;Li and Goldwasser, 2019;Mishra et al, 2019).…”
Section: Dynamic Word Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning of a word can also vary across extralinguistic contexts such as time (Bybee, 2015;Koch, 2016) and social space (Robinson, 2010(Robinson, , 2012Geeraerts, 2018). To capture these phenomena, various types of dynamic word embeddings have been proposed: diachronic word embeddings for temporal semantic change (Bamler and Mandt, 2017;Rosenfeld and Erk, 2018;Rudolph and Blei, 2018;Yao et al, 2018;Gong et al, 2020) and personalized word embeddings for social semantic variation (Zeng et al, 2017(Zeng et al, , 2018Oba et al, 2019;Welch et al, 2020a,b;Yao et al, 2020). Other studies have demonstrated that performance on a diverse set of tasks can be increased by including temporal (Jaidka et al, 2018;Lukes and Søgaard, 2018) and social information (Amir et al, 2016;Hamilton et al, 2016a;Yang et al, 2016;Yang and Eisenstein, 2017;Hazarika et al, 2018;Mishra et al, 2018;del Tredici et al, 2019b;Li and Goldwasser, 2019;Mishra et al, 2019).…”
Section: Dynamic Word Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, methods based on adversarial neural networks [15] and reinforcement learning [37] have also been proposed for enhancing data quality. In addition to these user profile-based methods, Zhou et al [39] and Yao et al [36] argued that the query representation is dynamically changing in different historical contexts. They used the history to learn the embedding of the current query.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Personalized Web Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the processing of AOL query logs is not sufficiently clear for the construction of personalized search datasets. The existing personalized search datasets based on AOL query logs in different scales in other papers are almost publicly unavailable [4,5]. It is because there is no complete and clear dataset construction process and no publicly available personalized search dataset, there is a gap to fill in the research field of personalized search.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some available public datasets, e.g., Yandex 1 and SEARCH17 [3], have no raw text of queries or documents. For another famous data collection, AOL query logs [4,5], there are no publicly available personalized search datasets based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%