Internal Labour Markets, Incentives and Employment 1998
DOI: 10.1057/9780230377974_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment Adjustment in Japanese Firms: Negative Profits and Dismissals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…results regarding the answer to such a basic question as the evolution of employment adjustment speed certainly lies in the differences of data (for example macro vs. micro as shown by Chuma, 2002), of samples of firms and period or of modelling of the process (continuous vs. discrete). However, to our view, a key reason, as we will try to show it in our own result, refers to an inappropriate modelling of the heterogeneity, which more deeply correspond to an insufficient attention to the increasing heterogeneity of the Japanese human resources management models from the 1990s, despite isolated and not enough systematic attempts (see for example Suruga, 1998;Chuma, 2002;Abe, 2002;Noda, 2002).…”
Section: The Japanese Case: Literature Review and Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…results regarding the answer to such a basic question as the evolution of employment adjustment speed certainly lies in the differences of data (for example macro vs. micro as shown by Chuma, 2002), of samples of firms and period or of modelling of the process (continuous vs. discrete). However, to our view, a key reason, as we will try to show it in our own result, refers to an inappropriate modelling of the heterogeneity, which more deeply correspond to an insufficient attention to the increasing heterogeneity of the Japanese human resources management models from the 1990s, despite isolated and not enough systematic attempts (see for example Suruga, 1998;Chuma, 2002;Abe, 2002;Noda, 2002).…”
Section: The Japanese Case: Literature Review and Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Many studies have already found significant differences of speed of employment adjustment across industries (Abe, 2002). Regarding the size, it tends to slow down the speed of adjustment for the following reason (Suruga, 1998): the bigger a firm is, the more it can resort to internal transfers of a part of the workforce, which is not accounted in studies focusing on external mobility.…”
Section: The Japanese Case: Literature Review and Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Further, it is assumed that the speed of employment adjustment will differ in times of surplus and loss, so a dummy variable (DUM) is added to indicate when the firm is showing a loss (1 ¼ loss). Previous research has confirmed that firms experiencing two consecutive periods of loss undertake major employment adjustments (Koike 1983;Muramatsu 1986Muramatsu , 1995Suruga 1997). If that is the case, the parameters for this dummy variable should take on a positive value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The speed of employment adjustment is used as corroborating evidence of the stable employment system in Japanese firms. and Suruga (1997) have analyzed financial data from individual firms to measure the speed of employment adjustment. Suruga estimates several models of employment adjustment and finds that the deficit model fits the evidence the best.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the practice of "lifetime employment" does not necessarily mean that layoffs never happen in large Japanese firms. It has been documented that Japanese firms, even large ones, did lay off some of their regular employees, following the first oil crisis (see, for example, Koike, 2005, Suruga, 1998, Nakata and Takehiro, 2003, Chuma, 2002 years. This paper is aimed at providing such evidence and contributing to the debate over the convergence theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%