2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7750(04)29008-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment and Intellectual Disability: Achieving Successful Employment Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such differences may be partly attributable to the quality of prior experiences employers have had with people with disabilities (Chen et al, 2016). The intention of employers to hire people with disabilities is typically low if prior experiences have been unsatisfactory (Smith et al, 2004a). When an employer perceives the job performance of employees with disabilities to be the same or better than that of their coworkers without disabilities, their willingness to hire people with disabilities increases (Greenan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such differences may be partly attributable to the quality of prior experiences employers have had with people with disabilities (Chen et al, 2016). The intention of employers to hire people with disabilities is typically low if prior experiences have been unsatisfactory (Smith et al, 2004a). When an employer perceives the job performance of employees with disabilities to be the same or better than that of their coworkers without disabilities, their willingness to hire people with disabilities increases (Greenan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful employment outcomes depend on employment opportunities, employee expectations about work conditions, and employer satisfaction with the employee’s job performance and culture fit (Smith et al, 2004b). Because different key stakeholders set different criteria for success, there is no universally accepted definition of “success” in employment (Hees et al, 2012); employees may prioritize job satisfaction and work-life balance, whereas employers focus on sustainability and at-work functioning (Hees et al, 2012; Heslin, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, employers may be less willing to hire people with disabilities. However, a good match between the applicant and the job can make a real difference for an employer concerning the decision to hire a person with a disability (Fraser, Ajzen, Johnson, Hebert, & Chan, 2011;Gilbride, Stensrud, Vandergoot, & Golden, 2003;Smith, Webber, Graffam, & Wilson, 2004). Employers also attach importance to knowledge and information about disabilities, and a good and stable communication with disability employment agencies or an expert to be contacted in case of problems arising at the workplace (Kaye et al, 2011).…”
Section: Employers' Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a limited number of cases, employers do have a positive attitude right from the outset, but this is usually when employers have prior personal experience with people with disability. These findings provide some clarity regarding the conflicting findings of studies that report the views of employers, which typically report positive employer attitudes, and studies that report the perspectives of people with disability, which typically report negative employer attitudes (Bredgaard and Salado-Rasmussen, 2021;Gilbride et al, 2000;Hernandez et al, 2007;Hernandez et al, 2000;Ju et al, 2013;Smith et al, 2004). This disparity is likely due to social desirability bias on the part of employers who want to appear inclusive to people with disability.…”
Section: Methodological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 83%