2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15081674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment and People with Non Communicable Chronic Diseases: PATHWAYS Recommendations and Suggested Actions for Implementing an Inclusive Labour Market for All and Health in All Sectors

Abstract: n/a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work and health are interrelated in many ways. The ageing of the working population combined with the dramatic low employment rates of persons with chronic diseases (PwCDs) is an indicative depiction of this particular relation [21,22]. All mechanisms should champion the importance of strengthening health promotion, preventive services, public health, and social care [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work and health are interrelated in many ways. The ageing of the working population combined with the dramatic low employment rates of persons with chronic diseases (PwCDs) is an indicative depiction of this particular relation [21,22]. All mechanisms should champion the importance of strengthening health promotion, preventive services, public health, and social care [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues that could hinder the self‐management by DM patients at work are often related to human resource and labour policies and laws, e.g., stigmatisation and discrimination at work place (Ruston et al., 2013 ), support from employers (Weijman et al., 2005 ) and sick leave arrangements and the situation of DM patients among the working population clearly brings out this cross‐over of public health and labour policies. It is worth noting that the self‐management of chronic disease patients among the working population has already reached policy level discussion in the European Union, and challenges faced by chronic disease patients, including those with DM, in self‐managing their conditions at work and the corresponding measures have been mapped out (Leonardi & Scaratti, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues that could hinder the self-management by DM patients at work are often related to human resource and labour policies and laws, e.g., stigmatisation and discrimination at work place(Ruston et al, 2013), support from employers(Weijman et al, 2005) and sick leave arrangements and the situation of DM patients among the working population clearly brings out this crossover of public health and labour policies. It is worth noting that the self-management of chronic disease patients among the working population has already reached policy level discussion in the European Union, and challenges faced by chronic disease patients, including those with DM, in self-managing their conditions at work and the corresponding measures have been mapped out(Leonardi & Scaratti, 2018).This study highlighted the urgent need for a better understanding of the DM situation among the working population for health education, health service planning and more accurate assessment on the economic and social cost of DM. In order to build up evidence for possible change in public health and labour policies to facilitate better prevention and disease control by DM patients at work, cohort study should be conducted to examine the risk factors; and studies looking at the self-management behaviours of non-skilled DM patients are also recommended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with this evidence, the European PATHWAYS project (www.path-ways.eu), which identified the impact of chronic diseases on European socio-medical systems, has shown how the existing EU and national level legislations regarding inclusive work are not specifically addressed to people with chronic diseases [9][10][11]. Conversely, these legislations apply to specific population groups, such as people with disabilities, long-term unemployed and "fragile" groups, but do not necessarily answer the needs of people affected with one or more chronic diseases [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%