“…Empirically, several influential studies link sectoral growth to labour market performance which motivates our work. This literature follows broadly three strands: (1) the impact of structural transformation on unemployment and poverty (Arias-Vazquez et al, 2021;Basile et al, 2011;Christiaensen & Kaminski, 2015;Lilien, 1982;Loayza & Raddatz, 2006;Ravallion & Chen, 2004;Ravallion & Datt, 1996Suryahadi et al, 2008) , (2) sector-specific growth, poverty, and unemployment (Alvarez-Cuadrado & Poschke, 2011;Christiaensen et al, 2010;de Janvry & Sadoulet, 2009;Ellis et al, 2018), and (3) natural resources, poverty and unemployment (i.e., natural resource curse) (Caselli & Michaels, 2009;Mcmillan & Rodrik, 2011). According to Christiaensen & Kaminski, (2015), sector growth can contribute to employment and thus low poverty or unemployment through two channels first through within-sectoral economic growth where assets such as labour and land change (Ravallion & Datt, 1996), and second through inter-sectoral factor mobility from low to high productivity sectors (Mcmillan & Rodrik, 2011), and more recently which Arias-Vazquez et al ( 2021) calls structural transformation.…”