2007
DOI: 10.1080/10826080701409701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment and Work Among Drug Court Clients: 12-Month Outcomes

Abstract: Employment contributes to drug abuse treatment success and is an important treatment outcome (Institute of Medicine, 1990). However, few tailored employment interventions are available. This project developed an employment intervention focused on obtaining, maintaining, and upgrading employment. The current study, approved by an IRB, uses 12-month outcomes to examine intervention dosage effects. Participants were 500 clients who entered two Kentucky drug court programs between March 2000 and November 2002. Mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a predictor of treatment success and has been shown to be a significant factor in substance treatment entry (1), treatment retention (2), and treatment completion (3). Employment has also been identified as a desirable outcome of substance abuse treatment (4) and has been associated with positive treatment outcomes. In particular, employment decreases the likelihood and severity of relapse (5) and lowers depression and other mental health issues (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is a predictor of treatment success and has been shown to be a significant factor in substance treatment entry (1), treatment retention (2), and treatment completion (3). Employment has also been identified as a desirable outcome of substance abuse treatment (4) and has been associated with positive treatment outcomes. In particular, employment decreases the likelihood and severity of relapse (5) and lowers depression and other mental health issues (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The short-term positive effects of treatment on subsequent labor force participation have been fairly well documented (Butzin, Scarpitti, Neilsen, Martin, & Inciardi, 1999;French et al, 1993;Hall et al, 2004;Kemp, Savitz, Thompson, & Zanis, 2004;Leukefeld, Webster, Staton-Tindall, & Duvall, 2007). Nevertheless, while some evidence points to the enduring nature of the improved work status resulting from criminal justice-sponsored treatment, with benefits lasting between 3 and 5 years (Butzin et al, 2005;O'Connell, Enev, Martin, & Inciardi, 2007;Sung, 2001), the lack of experimental control or the failure to control for baseline employment differences, or both, in these longitudinal studies renders their findings inconclusive and the contamination from self-selection highly plausible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, research on employment and work outcomes among drug court participants conducted by Leukefeld, Webster, Staton-Tindall, and Duvall (2007) demonstrates that participants who received an employment/skills training intervention, while mandated to drug court, reported decreased drug use and recidivism compared with the treatment as usual control group in the study. More specifically, increased dosage and exposure to the employment intervention was associated with decreased self-reported substance use and criminality among the drug court clients.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%