Employment Assimilation of Immigrants in the Netherlands

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in AbstractUsing two Dutch labour force surveys, employment assimilation of immigrants is examined. We observe marked differences between immigrants by source country. Non-western immigrants never reach parity with native Dutch. Even second generation immigrants never fully catch up. Caribbean immigrants, who share a colonial history with the Dutch, assimilate relatively quick compared to other non-western immigrants but they still suffer from high unemployment. The study also documents that the quality of jobs is significantly lower for immigrants, especially for those who are at larger cultural distance to Dutch society. Job quality of immigrants increases with the duration of stay but again, does not reach parity with natives. The western immigrants seem to face no considerable difficulties in the Dutch labour market. The most remarkable conclusion is the irrelevance of education for socio-economic position of immigrants once the country of origin has been controlled for. Acknowledgements:The research was based on collaboration with Statistics Netherlands. We are grateful to Henk-Jan Dirven.2

Labour Market Penalties of New Immigrants in New and Old Receiving West European Countries

“…1 1 The studies regarding Italy, Spain, Denmark and Germany are included in this issue, whereas those regarding the Netherlands and the United Kingdom were published elsewhere (Zorlu and Hartog, 2008; Demireva, forthcoming). …”

Location choices of migrant nest-leavers: Spatial assimilation or continued segregation?

“…The rank orders are similar for migrant men and women, although migrant women are more likely than migrant men to move to a neighbourhood with many immigrants. Interestingly, even after controlling for socio-economic background, this rank order of countries of origin in the inclination to move to areas with greater non-western concentrations reflects the typical rank order in the socio-economic positions of these immigrant groups (Zorlu & Hartog, 2008).…”

“…An increasing number of studies show that the performance of immigrants has increased with duration of stay. The second generation is better educated than their parents, which leads to direct rewards in the labour market (Zorlu & Hartog, 2008). As posited by spatial assimilation theory (Massey, 1985), a decreasing socio-economic distance between an immigrant group and the majority population is expected to lead to a decline in spatial distance between these groups.…”

Who is most influential? Adolescents’ intergroup attitudes and peer influence within a social network

“…The present research focuses on the social influence of attitudes toward Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority members among adolescents in the Netherlands. For decades, the Netherlands had an image as a tolerant society that happily welcomed immigrants and offered shelter to refugees (Zorlu & Hartog, 2001). This image changed in the late 1990s and early 2000s when the political and public discourse started to blame immigrants for societal problems surrounding integration and ethnic diversity (Vasta, 2007).…”