The GeoJournal Library
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5762-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas: A comprehensive comparison and policy implications

Abstract: Abstract:This chapter features a cross-national comparison of economic deconcentration in 12 European metropolitan areas analysing two attributes of employment deconcentration: the magnitude, which refers to the scale of deconcentration; and the physical form. The discussion is positioned in the framework of two dimensions of governance systems: welfare-state regime and central-local government relations. Our expectation that deconcentration would take place on a smaller scale and in a more concentrated form i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This will lead to new trade-offs between location centrality and travel costs (Muller, 1995/2004). Urban development could spread over larger areas, resulting in lower densities—a development comparable with previous processes in Western countries (Dijst and Vázquez, 2007).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This will lead to new trade-offs between location centrality and travel costs (Muller, 1995/2004). Urban development could spread over larger areas, resulting in lower densities—a development comparable with previous processes in Western countries (Dijst and Vázquez, 2007).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The influences of polycentric urban development on the spatial relationship between jobs and housing and commuting length could be affected by institutional factors through the interaction between public polices and market forces (Dijst & Vazquez, 2007;Zhao & Lu, 2010). Compared with Europe, urban development in the USA is more often privately financed and less led by national policies (Cervero, 1995), and therefore sprawling patterns of decentralization occur under weak regulation (Razin, 2007).…”
Section: Institutional Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the pattern drawn up by Larsen [7] and the model further developed by Dijst and Vazquez [8], Italy can be classified, in the European context, as leaning "towards a decentralized liberal system model" (p. 267) [8]. Italy is, in fact, a country with a high level of decentralization where, despite the high level of regulation, there is a high degree of freedom in actual practice.…”
Section: Urban Studies Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%