Employment Struggles and the Commodification of Time: Marx and the Analysis of Working Time Flexibility

Abstract

This paper explores new working time arrangements around a critique of the 'commodification of time' to illuminate the contradictions of such new flexibilities. Two features of these new arrangements are seen as relevant for evaluating the Marx/Engels analysis. Firstly, those arguing the commodification of time represent all [can you suggest a wording that will make clear what this 'all' refers to?] having become a commodity outside of the processes of exchange for labour power. Significantly -and central in all working time arrangements -it is labour power that is sold, be it for a particular period of time, rather than the time itself. Hence, working time arrangements set boundaries against 'free' time or time in which labour power is not sold as a commodity, that 'free' time which was recognised in the traditional arrangements -fought over in early industrialism -which set premium payments against anti-social hours within 'overtime'. New working time arrangements tend to blur the boundaries between 'free' and 'working' time, assuming an availability of labour power to capital. While much of the promotion of flexibility stresses the possibility of making adjustment to suit social and domestic requirements it is more usually the means for altering working time to meet the demands of capital. The much vaunted case of Volkswagen has led to 'working time accounts' becoming the established temporal arrangement within the German car industry and increasingly becoming the norm for other European auto producers. The name given to these new working arrangements within the motor industry suggests that time has indeed become further commodified. For workers within these new time regimes, the hours owed to their employer is displayed along with their earnings -and deductions -on their wage slip.

Trajectories of Vulnerability and Resistance Among Independent Indoor Sex Workers During Economic Decline

“…Conversely, those in work experience an intensification of work: workers are pushed to produce more within less time to increase their efficiency and maximise profits (Everingham, 2002). In the name of flexibility, employers have sought to control more of the worker’s time, removed temporal protections, and encouraged self-regulation in work contracts (Rubery et al, 2005; Tuckman, 2005) to fuel the capitalistic drive for productivity and efficiency. The worker is thus expected to offer constant availability to supply and produce while there is demand; to fail to do so indicated inefficiency and a lost opportunity for profit.…”

Let Me Save You Some Time... On Valuing Travelers’ Time in Urban Transportation

“…On the other hand, we claim that the feature of not being accumulative is distinctly special for time since time can never be accumulated, not even a little. Recent technological developments such as devices making it possible to work remotely as well as more flexible working arrangements than the traditional norm have contributed to the perception that time is something that can be saved (Tuckman 2005). Nevertheless, in reality, there is simply no way to actually save time; time can only be instantaneously reallocated to other activities.…”

The state, employment, and regulation: making work not pay

“…This has significant implications for pay levels as it renders statutory or voluntary minimum hourly pay rates ineffectual (Moore, 2014). In addition to securing low pay, this leads not only to the intensification and extensification of working time (Hayes and Moore, 2014), but also facilitates the shifting boundaries between commodified and de-commodified time (Tuckman, 2005). As such, the proliferation of ZHCs is a significant element of the proliferation of unpaid labour in the UK economy, and is a significant facilitating factor of the low-pay economy.…”