2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMPOWER CERVICAL-1: Effects of cemiplimab versus chemotherapy on patient-reported quality of life, functioning and symptoms among women with recurrent cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly objective responses were seen also in patients with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. The good safety profile of cemiplimab was consistent with that previously reported for the other ICIs in other tumor types ( 14 ). Importantly, only 8.7% of patients receiving cemiplimab discontinued treatment for any grade of immune-related adverse events (irAE)s.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly objective responses were seen also in patients with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. The good safety profile of cemiplimab was consistent with that previously reported for the other ICIs in other tumor types ( 14 ). Importantly, only 8.7% of patients receiving cemiplimab discontinued treatment for any grade of immune-related adverse events (irAE)s.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although PD‐L1 is expressed in 34.4%−96% of CCa tissues, the objective response rate was only 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) among cemiplimab‐treated patients with PD‐L1 expression in ≥1% of cells and merely 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) among those with PD‐L1 expression in <1% of cells. [ 12 ] The results of these trials suggest that a small subset of PD‐L1‐positive patients benefit from PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor therapy, underscoring the need for combinatorial approaches involving blockade of the PD‐L1 pathway for cancer therapy. Moreover, these observations emphasize the importance of developing strategies to modulate the TIME and identifying novel therapeutic targets to improve immunotherapy outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 For the first time in years, patients with recurrent or metastatic disease who have already received one line of systemic chemotherapy now have an option for treatment that is superior to traditional chemotherapy and has a safety profile and infusion schedule that allow for an acceptable quality of life. 9 The interest in immunotherapy for this disease has led to further exploration of its use in the frontline setting: in combination with chemotherapy for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease and in combination with chemoradiation (CRT) for patients with locally advanced disease. The results of Keynote 826, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, led to FDA approval of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, for patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer whose tumors expressed PD-L1 (combined positive score ≥ 1).…”
Section: Immunotherapy (Table 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the overall trial population (including all patients, regardless of their tumor PD‐L1 status), the median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than the chemotherapy group (12.0 vs. 8.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56–0.84; two‐sided p < .001) 8 . For the first time in years, patients with recurrent or metastatic disease who have already received one line of systemic chemotherapy now have an option for treatment that is superior to traditional chemotherapy and has a safety profile and infusion schedule that allow for an acceptable quality of life 9 …”
Section: Immunotherapy (Table 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation