2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-019-09224-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empowering cultural heritage professionals with tools for authoring and deploying personalised visitor experiences

Abstract: This paper presents an authoring environment, which supports cultural heritage professionals in the process of creating and deploying a wide range of different personalised interactive experiences that combine the physical (objects, collection and spaces) and the digital (multimedia content). It is based on a novel flexible formalism that represents the content and the context as independent from one another and allows recombining them in multiple ways thus generating many different interactions from the same … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While personalization tends to be approached in terms of matching users with relevant content, it can also focus on making an experience feel more personal by developing a personal connection between the visitor and the museum. Not and Petrelli (2019), for example, describe a system for generating personalized postcards summarizing visits. Alternatively, some museums have explored personalized storytelling and play as a means of fostering personal connections (Katifori et al , 2014; Vayanou et al , 2019).…”
Section: Reviewing Data Use In Museums and Galleriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While personalization tends to be approached in terms of matching users with relevant content, it can also focus on making an experience feel more personal by developing a personal connection between the visitor and the museum. Not and Petrelli (2019), for example, describe a system for generating personalized postcards summarizing visits. Alternatively, some museums have explored personalized storytelling and play as a means of fostering personal connections (Katifori et al , 2014; Vayanou et al , 2019).…”
Section: Reviewing Data Use In Museums and Galleriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the personalization of museum experiences is not always easy. Not and Petrelli (2019) suggest that a major obstacle to large-scale adoption of personalization in cultural heritage is the complexity of the technical systems, requiring technical expertise that is out of reach for most cultural heritage professionals with the implication that successful approaches may need to be technically lightweight. While personalization tends to be approached as a challenge of matching users with relevant content, it can also be considered as the challenge of making an experience feel more personal , or developing a personal connection between the visitor and the museum.…”
Section: Interpersonalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personalization can occur at different levels, having different influence on the effectiveness of use. The work presented in [18], for example, identifies three types of customization: adaptability (also called customization), that offers the user the possibility of setting options so that the system adopts a desired behavior; context-awareness that is the system's ability to perceive dynamic changes in the environment and adapt accordingly to them; adaptivity that is the system's ability to adapt its behavior by inserting, for example, additional content. The adaptivity property, in particular, is the most complex to implement, requiring more effort from the author.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%