36Background: The eMERGE III Network was tasked with harmonizing genetic testing protocols linking multiple 37 sites and investigators. 38Methods: DNA capture panels targeting 109 genes and 1551 variants were constructed by two clinical 39 sequencing centers for analysis of 25,000 participant DNA samples collected at 11 sites where samples were 40 linked to patients with electronic health records. Each step from sample collection, data generation, 41 interpretation, reporting, delivery and storage, were developed and validated in CAP/CLIA settings and 42 harmonized across sequencing centers. 43Results: A compliant and secure network was built and enabled ongoing review and reconciliation of clinical 44 interpretations while maintaining communication and data sharing between investigators. Mechanisms for 45 sustained propagation and growth of the network were established. An interim data freeze representing 15,574 46 sequenced subjects, informed the assay performance for a range of variant types, the rate of return of results 47Conclusions: This study established processes for different sequencing sites to harmonize the technical and 51 interpretive aspects of sequencing tests, a critical achievement towards global standardization of genomic 52 testing. The network established experience in the return of results and the rate of secondary findings across 53 diverse biobank populations. Furthermore, the eMERGE network has accomplished integration of structured 54 genomic results into multiple electronic health record systems, setting the stage for clinical decision support to 55 enable genomic medicine. 56 57 58 59 60 61 62The identification, interpretation and return of actionable clinical genetic findings is an increasing focus of 63 precision medicine. There is also growing awareness that the discovery of genes underlying human diseases is 64 dependent upon access to samples from carefully phenotyped individuals with (and without) clinical conditions. 65As clinical visits provide the ideal opportunity to record patient phenotypes, with appropriate consent, the medical 66 care of specific patient groups can drive the accumulation of clinical data and knowledge of the genetic 67 underpinnings of disease and the penetrance of DNA risk variants. This 'virtuous cycle' of data flow from the 68 bench to the bedside and back to the bench will be a key driver of progress in genetic and genomic translation. 69 70 While conceptually straightforward, there are many challenges that must be overcome for integrating clinical and 71 research agendas across global populations. Clinical visits are often brief, focused upon measurement related 72 to specific symptoms and constrained by fiscal and practical concerns. On the other hand, ascertainment for 73research is often open ended, longitudinal, and accompanied by rigorous consent procedures. The types of data 74 that are recorded for each purpose can be different in both depth and quality. As a result, ideal research and 75 clinical records often diverge. 76
77A second group of ...