2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empowering householders: Identifying predictors of intentions to use a home energy management system in the United Kingdom

Abstract: Trials of technologies designed to promote residential demand-side energy management (DSM) have found aggregate levels of load-shifting behaviour and curtailment in energy use. These aggregate data, however, mask considerable differences in people's engagement in DSM at an individual household level. We present the findings of a quantitative exploration of people's intentions to use a home energy management system (HEMS) for residential DSM in the United Kingdom. The technology acceptance model (TAM) was used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As our findings on communication behaviour and individuals' social contexts interrelate with these additional aspects, it is essential to situate these findings alongside other models which focus on other individualistic elements such as attributes and adopter characteristics (e.g. Whittle et al, 2020), followed by the consideration of wider contextual models (e.g. Grubler et al, 2018) to build a holistic theoretical framing.…”
Section: Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As our findings on communication behaviour and individuals' social contexts interrelate with these additional aspects, it is essential to situate these findings alongside other models which focus on other individualistic elements such as attributes and adopter characteristics (e.g. Whittle et al, 2020), followed by the consideration of wider contextual models (e.g. Grubler et al, 2018) to build a holistic theoretical framing.…”
Section: Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Examples include research on: i) the adoption-decision process (e.g. Ford et al, 2016;Sanguinetti et al, 2018); ii) consumer intention to adopt (using variants of TAM) (Hubert et al, 2019;Park et al, 2018a;Shin et al, 2018;Whittle et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2018); iii) a specific group of users such as older adults (Demiris et al, 2004) or technology enthusiasts (Mennicken and Huang, 2012); and iv) a variety of combinations of the above i.e. a specific group of potential users' intention to adopt (Baudier et al, 2018) or consumer intentions to adopt based on environmental concerns, beliefs and perceived usefulness (Schill et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike [24], we specifically examine users' perceptions and attitudes towards collecting and sharing data, as users have varying attitudes towards collecting and sharing their data. Also, prior studies [46,47] argue that the interplay between energy consumption data and personal habits is the key to stimulating energy-efficient behavior. This notion suggests that adoption or acceptance would depend mainly on users' attitudes, but such insights are missing concerning HEMS.…”
Section: Privacy In Development Of Green Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the time the model was conceptualised, it has been tested and has been the most widely applied model of user acceptance (Ma and Liu 2004). Whittle, Jones, and While (2020) in their study on identifying predictors of intentions to use home energy management system applied TAM. Bandara and Amarasena (2020) in their study on the intention to use solar technology proved that PEOU has a significant impact on solar technology adoption.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Model (Tam)mentioning
confidence: 99%