“…However, UI scholarship has presented unbalanced analyses of policy responses to the two disparate subsets of informality. It engages with state responses to informal housing for low-income communities by examining adaptive interventions – including infrastructure upgrading (Turner, 1972), aesthetics-based governance (Ghertner, 2010) and pro-environmental interventions (Jabeen and Guy, 2015; Nie, 2021) – as an alternative to forced eviction in pursuit of housing equity (Chien, 2018; Roy, 2005; Wigle, 2014). However, this scholarship implicitly co-opts the politics of connivance encouraging state–business complicity in speculative housing informality because it has not highlighted flexible-yet-just engagements with desire-based forms of informal housing (McFarlane, 2012; Mohammad et al, 2021; Roy, 2011).…”