2021
DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2021.1940029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empowering informal settlements in Jakarta with urban agriculture: exploring a community-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the findings and policy implications of this research are context specific and need site-specific analysis before being replicated in other countries or regions. First, Chinese urban villages exhibit uniqueness compared to other informal settlements characterized as illegal or temporary invasions and shortage of services provision in Latin America, southeast Europe, and some countries in Asia [ 78 , 79 , 80 ]. Chinese urban villages distinguish themselves at least with their rural social life, stable kinship ties, and characteristic village textures, which are conceived as a form of informality and derived from the villages’ long cultural histories, believed to be an engine for further development of urbanization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the findings and policy implications of this research are context specific and need site-specific analysis before being replicated in other countries or regions. First, Chinese urban villages exhibit uniqueness compared to other informal settlements characterized as illegal or temporary invasions and shortage of services provision in Latin America, southeast Europe, and some countries in Asia [ 78 , 79 , 80 ]. Chinese urban villages distinguish themselves at least with their rural social life, stable kinship ties, and characteristic village textures, which are conceived as a form of informality and derived from the villages’ long cultural histories, believed to be an engine for further development of urbanization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, UI scholarship has presented unbalanced analyses of policy responses to the two disparate subsets of informality. It engages with state responses to informal housing for low-income communities by examining adaptive interventions – including infrastructure upgrading (Turner, 1972), aesthetics-based governance (Ghertner, 2010) and pro-environmental interventions (Jabeen and Guy, 2015; Nie, 2021) – as an alternative to forced eviction in pursuit of housing equity (Chien, 2018; Roy, 2005; Wigle, 2014). However, this scholarship implicitly co-opts the politics of connivance encouraging state–business complicity in speculative housing informality because it has not highlighted flexible-yet-just engagements with desire-based forms of informal housing (McFarlane, 2012; Mohammad et al, 2021; Roy, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, the rationales of local states tolerating some types or parts of informality over others, regardless of demographic variation, and the subsequent state actions regarding them depend on the suitability of the housing and the degree of the construction’s externality in terms of environmental risk and additional carbon footprint. Therefore, the ‘environment’ has always played a key role in policies and protocols, and the criteria and standards regarding the evaluation of informality often link these buildings to the natural world, situating them within the environmental context (Chiu, 2020; Jabeen and Guy, 2015; Nie, 2021). Whether the state can rework the negative or potentially positive properties of the materiality inherent in extralegal buildings into use or exchange values influences how a country or city discursively constructs informality and embeds it within its political economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%